When building robust and maintainable applications with NestJS, the SOLID principles offer a proven path to writing clean and scalable code. Each principleβSingle Responsibility, Open/Closed, Liskov Substitution, Interface Segregation, and Dependency Inversionβguides how to design your application for simplicity and extensibility.
Letβs dive into these principles with examples and flowcharts! π
πͺ© 1. Single Responsibility Principle (SRP)
A class should have one and only one reason to change.
In NestJS, separation of concerns is achieved by dividing responsibilities across controllers, services, and repositories.
Example:
// π΄ MealController.ts
@Controller('meals')
export class MealController {
constructor(private readonly mealService: MealService) {}
@Post()
create(@Body() createMealDto: CreateMealDto) {
return this.mealService.create(createMealDto);
}
}
// π οΈ MealService.ts
@Injectable()
export class MealService {
create(createMealDto: CreateMealDto) {
// Business logic for creating a meal
}
}
By keeping these responsibilities separate, changes to one layer donβt affect others. π―
π 2. Open/Closed Principle (OCP)
A class should be open for extension but closed for modification.
In NestJS, decorators, inheritance, and abstraction help us extend functionality without modifying existing code.
Example:
// π LoggerService.ts
@Injectable()
export class LoggerService {
log(message: string) {
console.log(`Log: ${message}`);
}
}
// π§ CustomLoggerService.ts
@Injectable()
export class CustomLoggerService extends LoggerService {
log(message: string) {
super.log(message);
console.log(`Custom Log: ${message}`);
}
}
This way, LoggerService
remains untouched, and custom behavior is added via CustomLoggerService
. π
π€ 3. Liskov Substitution Principle (LSP)
Subtypes must be replaceable with their base types without affecting functionality.
By leveraging interfaces, NestJS allows services to be swapped seamlessly. This is especially useful for testing.
Example:
// π€ MealServiceInterface.ts
export interface MealServiceInterface {
create(createMealDto: CreateMealDto): any;
}
// β
MealService.ts
@Injectable()
export class MealService implements MealServiceInterface {
create(createMealDto: CreateMealDto) {
// Business logic
}
}
// π§ͺ MockMealService.ts
@Injectable()
export class MockMealService implements MealServiceInterface {
create(createMealDto: CreateMealDto) {
// Mock logic for tests
}
}
In this setup, you can replace MealService
with MockMealService
during testing without breaking the app. β
π 4. Interface Segregation Principle (ISP)
Classes should not be forced to implement methods they donβt use.
Split large interfaces into smaller, focused ones to avoid bloated implementations.
Example:
// π οΈ DatabaseReadable.ts
export interface DatabaseReadable {
findAll(): any[];
findOne(id: number): any;
}
// π οΈ DatabaseWritable.ts
export interface DatabaseWritable {
create(data: any): any;
update(id: number, data: any): any;
delete(id: number): void;
}
// π MealRepository.ts
export class MealRepository implements DatabaseReadable, DatabaseWritable {
findAll() { /* ... */ }
findOne(id: number) { /* ... */ }
create(data: any) { /* ... */ }
update(id: number, data: any) { /* ... */ }
delete(id: number) { /* ... */ }
}
Each interface focuses on specific responsibilities, keeping the code clean and modular. π οΈ
π 5. Dependency Inversion Principle (DIP)
High-level modules should depend on abstractions, not on concrete implementations.
In NestJS, dependency injection simplifies this by decoupling classes from their dependencies.
Example:
// π MealServiceInterface.ts
export abstract class MealServiceInterface {
abstract create(createMealDto: CreateMealDto): any;
}
// π οΈ MealService.ts
@Injectable()
export class MealService extends MealServiceInterface {
create(createMealDto: CreateMealDto) {
// Business logic
}
}
// π MealController.ts
@Controller('meals')
export class MealController {
constructor(private readonly mealService: MealServiceInterface) {}
@Post()
create(@Body() createMealDto: CreateMealDto) {
return this.mealService.create(createMealDto);
}
}
This allows us to switch to a different implementation of MealServiceInterface
without altering the controller. π
π SOLID Principles in a Diet Plan Service
Recently, I have been working on a diet plan service in NestJS. Here's how the SOLID principles help:
-
SRP:
- Controllers handle HTTP endpoints like adding meals or viewing plans.
- Services manage business logic, such as calculating calories or meal macros.
- Repositories interact with the database for storing and retrieving diet data.
OCP: New diet plans like
KetoDietPlanService
orVeganDietPlanService
can extend a baseDietPlanService
without modifying its core logic.LSP: Replace the actual
DietPlanService
with aMockDietPlanService
during testing to validate APIs without relying on the database.ISP: Split interfaces for user management, meal tracking, and dietary calculations to keep concerns modular.
DIP: Controllers rely on abstractions like
DietPlanInterface
, making it easier to introduce alternative implementations for new diet strategies.
π Why SOLID Matters in NestJS
Adopting the SOLID principles in NestJS ensures:
- π οΈ Maintainability: Easy to understand and modify code.
- π± Scalability: Add new features without breaking existing functionality.
- π§ͺ Testability: Mock dependencies for seamless testing.
π Final Thoughts
By applying these principles, our NestJS projects become more organized, extensible, and robust. Whether youβre building small-scale apps or enterprise-level solutions, keeping your code SOLID will save time and effort in the long run.
π‘ Letβs keep our projects clean, modular, and scalable! Happy coding! π
Top comments (0)