Accelerating Deep Learning with Amazon SageMaker

Ciao Tutti 👋

Recently I have been working on my thesis, and to be very honest, AWS and especially Amazon Sagemaker has been a real lifesaver. Since I always try to share whatever I learn, I tried to document my journey in this article.
In the below-shared article, we are going to discuss Distributed Training on Amazon Sagemaker. In which I have covered the following topics:

1. Introduction to Distributed Training
2. Why Use Amazon SageMaker for Distributed Training?
3. Supported Frameworks and Algorithms
4. Distributed Training Architectures
5. Setting Up a Distributed Training Job
6. Leveraging Built-in Distributed Training Libraries
7. Performance Tuning and Scaling Best Practices
8. Case Studies and Real-World Examples

I hope you like this one. I am sorry for this being too long compared to my other articles.

---

1. Introduction to Distributed Training

Deep learning models have become increasingly complex, often requiring massive datasets and substantial computational resources to train effectively. Traditional, single-instance training—where a model is trained on just one machine—quickly becomes inefficient or even infeasible as data sizes grow and models become more sophisticated. This is where distributed training comes into play.

Distributed training is the process of splitting the training workload across multiple computing resources (often GPUs or whole machines) to reduce training time and handle datasets that exceed the memory or processing capabilities of a single machine. By leveraging parallel processing and optimized data handling, distributed training enables data scientists and machine learning engineers to iterate faster, build more accurate models, and experiment with larger network architectures. Below are some foundational concepts that illustrate how distributed training works and why it is essential for modern deep learning:

1. Large-Scale Data Handling

   • Faster Throughput: Multiple machines or GPUs working in parallel can process more data in the same amount of time, significantly accelerating training.
   • Reduced Training Time: Distributing the workload shortens the time needed to complete an epoch (a full pass through the data), helping teams reach results faster and iterate on their models more frequently.
   • Overcoming Memory Constraints: When datasets are too large to fit into a single machine’s memory, splitting data across multiple nodes becomes a necessity rather than a luxury.

2. Parallelization Strategies

   • Data Parallelism: In this common approach, the full model is copied to each compute node, but the dataset is split into chunks. Each node processes a batch of data independently and then synchronizes gradients before updating model parameters.
   • Model Parallelism: For extremely large models that don’t fit on a single GPU, different parts (layers or sub-networks) of the model are distributed across multiple GPUs. This approach is more complex but can be crucial for ultra-scale architectures.

3. Scalability Benefits

   • Horizontal Scaling: Instead of relying on one large machine, you can add or remove multiple machines (or GPUs) to match the size of your problem and your budget. This flexibility lets organizations grow or shrink their infrastructure in a cost-effective manner.
   • Fault Tolerance: Distributed training can be made resilient to individual machine failures through checkpointing mechanisms and replicated model states.

4. Why It’s Essential for Deep Learning

   • Complex Models: State-of-the-art neural networks for applications like natural language processing (NLP) and computer vision can have billions of parameters. Training these models on a single GPU would be prohibitively slow.
   • Real-Time and Near-Real-Time Needs: Industries such as autonomous driving, finance, and healthcare often require timely insights from massive datasets. Distributed training helps meet these stringent performance needs.
   • Experimentation and Innovation: By reducing training time, ML teams can more rapidly iterate on ideas, leading to faster innovation and more robust models.

Challenges in Distributed Training

• Communication Overhead: As more machines and GPUs are added, the cost of synchronizing model parameters and gradients increases. Proper strategies and frameworks are needed to minimize this overhead.
• Implementation Complexity: Writing and maintaining code for distributed systems can be more complex. Tools like Amazon SageMaker, Horovod, and native framework integrations simplify this process.
• Monitoring & Debugging: With multiple machines involved, detecting and diagnosing performance bottlenecks or errors can be harder, requiring specialized logging and monitoring tools.

Overall, distributed training represents the next evolution in deep learning model development, allowing data teams to train bigger models on bigger datasets in a shorter time.

---

2. Why Use Amazon SageMaker for Distributed Training?

Amazon SageMaker stands out as a fully managed platform that significantly simplifies the process of setting up, running, and scaling distributed training. By automating much of the heavy lifting around infrastructure provisioning and maintenance, it allows ML teams to focus on model development rather than DevOps. Here are some key benefits and differentiators:

1. Managed Infrastructure and Orchestration

   • SageMaker handles resource allocation and cluster management automatically, so you don’t need to manually configure VMs or container orchestration.
   • You can easily define how many instances and which instance types to use in your training cluster, and SageMaker provisions and tears them down on your behalf.

2. Seamless Framework Integration

   • SageMaker supports popular deep learning frameworks like TensorFlow and PyTorch out of the box. These come pre-configured with libraries that streamline distributed training.
   • For custom or specialized frameworks, you can bring your own containers, ensuring maximum flexibility while still benefiting from SageMaker’s distributed capabilities.

3. Built-in Distributed Training Libraries

   • SageMaker offers built-in support for data parallelism and model parallelism, making it straightforward to train large models or large datasets without manually writing distributed logic.
   • Integration with libraries like Horovod, DeepSpeed, or parameter servers accelerates training and reduces the complexity of synchronization.

4. Automatic Scalability and Cost Controls

   • You can scale up or down based on performance needs, and leverage Spot Instances to reduce training costs.
   • SageMaker’s managed environment includes tools like the AWS Auto Scaling feature, allowing you to automate infrastructure adjustments as your workload demands change.

5. Monitoring, Debugging, and Logging

   • Amazon SageMaker Debugger and other AWS monitoring services (e.g., Amazon CloudWatch) provide granular insight into training metrics and resource usage.
   • Automated anomaly detection helps catch issues such as vanishing gradients or poor parameter initializations early in the training process.

6. Secure Integration with Other AWS Services

   • SageMaker easily integrates with AWS data services like Amazon S3 for storage, AWS Glue for data cataloguing, and Amazon Redshift for analytics, streamlining data pipelines.
   • Features like AWS KMS (Key Management Service), IAM roles, and VPC support ensure your data and model artefacts remain secure throughout the training lifecycle.

7. Faster Iteration and Collaboration

   • By centralizing model code, datasets, and artefacts in one environment, SageMaker simplifies collaboration among data scientists and ML engineers.
   • Automating the repeated tasks of experiment tracking, versioning, and deployment reduces the time to iterate on new ideas.

Overall, the combination of managed infrastructure, pre-built integrations, and robust tooling makes Amazon SageMaker an attractive solution for distributed training—especially for teams looking to speed up model development cycles while minimizing operational overhead.

---

3. Supported Frameworks and Algorithms

One of the main advantages of Amazon SageMaker is its extensive support for both built-in algorithms and third-party frameworks. This flexibility lets you choose the best tooling for your specific use case, whether it’s computer vision, natural language processing, recommendation systems, or time-series forecasting.

3.1 Built-in Algorithms

Amazon SageMaker provides a suite of built-in algorithms that are optimized to run at scale on AWS infrastructure. Some popular examples include:

• XGBoost: A high-performance implementation of the Gradient Boosted Trees algorithm commonly used for structured or tabular data.
• Image Classification: A convolutional neural network (CNN) approach for classifying images into pre-defined categories.
• Object Detection: Identifies and classifies objects within an image, suitable for use cases like retail inventory tracking or autonomous vehicles.
• Semantic Segmentation: Breaks down an image into meaningful segments, often used in medical imaging or self-driving car applications.
• Random Cut Forest (RCF): An unsupervised algorithm for anomaly detection in time-series or high-dimensional data.

These built-in algorithms come with pre-optimized containers that handle distributed training details. You can scale your jobs horizontally with minimal changes to your training script or hyperparameters.

3.2 Popular Deep Learning Frameworks

For more customized deep learning tasks, SageMaker provides first-class support for popular open-source frameworks:

• TensorFlow

  • Offers a range of APIs (Keras, low-level ops) for building neural networks.
  • Leverages SageMaker’s distributed training libraries for data parallelism or model parallelism.
  • Provides integrated tools like TensorBoard for visualization and debugging.

• PyTorch

  • Known for its dynamic computational graph, making it flexible and intuitive for research and experimentation.
  • Supports distributed training with native PyTorch libraries (e.g., torch.distributed) or third-party libraries like Horovod.

• Apache MXNet

  • Offers both imperative and symbolic programming for neural networks.
  • Well-suited for large-scale, high-performance training across multiple GPUs.

• Hugging Face Transformers

  • Specialized containers for training state-of-the-art NLP models (BERT, GPT, etc.).
  • Built-in support for distributed training with minimal code changes.

3.3 Bringing Your Own Framework or Container

If you have specialized requirements or prefer a framework that isn’t natively supported, SageMaker’s “bring your own container” approach lets you:

• Customize the Environment: Install specific libraries, dependencies, or system packages needed for your model.
• Retain Control Over Runtime: Define exactly how your code runs, while still benefiting from SageMaker’s distributed training features and integrations with AWS services.

With these varied options, Amazon SageMaker delivers the flexibility and scalability needed for virtually any machine learning task—ranging from classic supervised learning with pre-built algorithms to cutting-edge deep learning applications using TensorFlow or PyTorch at scale.

---

4. Distributed Training Architectures

When you scale deep learning to multiple GPUs or machines, you typically use one of two main parallelization strategies:

1. Data Parallelism
2. Model Parallelism

Both methods aim to accelerate training and handle bigger workloads than a single device can manage. However, they differ significantly in how you distribute the model and the data.

Data Parallelism

In data parallelism, each GPU (or node) keeps a full copy of the model weights. The dataset is split into chunks (mini-batches), and each GPU processes a different chunk of data in parallel:

1. Forward Pass: Each GPU computes predictions (forward pass) on its subset of the data.
2. Backward Pass: Each GPU computes gradients locally.
3. Gradient Aggregation: The gradients from all GPUs are then averaged (or summed) and used to update the model weights so that each GPU stays synchronized.

When to Use It

• When your model can fit into the memory of a single GPU, but you have a massive dataset.
• When you want a simpler, more common approach that most ML frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch) natively support.

Advantages

• Ease of Implementation: Well-supported by popular libraries (Horovod, native PyTorch/TensorFlow APIs).
• Scalability: Works well for many tasks, especially when the model size is moderate but the dataset is large.

Challenges

• Communication Overhead: As the number of GPUs grows, synchronizing gradients can become a bottleneck.
• Diminishing Returns: Beyond a certain number of GPUs, the time spent aggregating updates can offset training speed gains.

Model Parallelism

In model parallelism, you partition the model itself across multiple GPUs. Each device holds a different slice of the model’s layers or parameters:

1. Layer Partitioning: Some layers (or sub-layers) run on GPU 1, others on GPU 2, etc.
2. Forward Pass: Outputs from each partition are passed as inputs to the next GPU.
3. Backward Pass: Gradients flow back through the same partitions in reverse order.

When to Use It

• When the model is too large to fit on a single GPU (e.g., large NLP transformers, cutting-edge vision architectures).
• When memory consumption is the main bottleneck, even if the dataset isn’t huge.

Advantages

• Training Larger Models: Makes it possible to handle models that exceed single-device memory limits.
• Potential Speed Ups: Especially in tandem with data parallelism for a hybrid approach (pipeline or tensor parallelism).

Challenges

• Implementation Complexity: You must carefully manage data transfers between GPUs, and debugging is harder.
• Load Balancing: An uneven distribution of layers or operations can lead to idle GPUs, reducing overall efficiency.

Example Performance Comparison

In practice, data parallelism usually yields diminishing returns as you add more GPUs due to communication overhead. Model parallelism can help train massive models but requires more sophisticated orchestration.

This can be seen in the graph shared below:

The chart compares training time (in minutes) for hypothetical data parallel and model parallel approaches as you increase the number of GPUs. It’s a simplified illustration to show that both can reduce training time, but their effectiveness depends on how well they can scale with additional hardware.

Choosing the Right Approach

• Data Parallelism is generally easier to set up. If your model fits on a single GPU and you just need to process large batches or large datasets faster, start here.
• Model Parallelism is crucial when dealing with huge models that exceed GPU memory limits or when you want to push the boundaries of deep learning architectures.

In many large-scale training scenarios, practitioners use hybrid approaches (such as pipeline parallelism or tensor parallelism) that combine both data and model parallelism for maximum efficiency. Amazon SageMaker supports these strategies through built-in and custom distribution libraries, giving you flexibility in how you distribute both data and compute.

By understanding data parallelism vs. model parallelism—and knowing when each is most beneficial—you can better architect your training strategy for large-scale tasks.

5. Setting Up a Distributed Training Job

5.1 Prepare Your Training Script

1. Select Your Framework

   • Decide whether you’ll use TensorFlow, PyTorch, or another deep learning framework.
   • For example, in PyTorch, you might rely on torch.distributed or Horovod to handle communication.

2. Include Distributed Logic

   • Data Parallel Example: In PyTorch, initialize your process group (e.g., torch.distributed.init_process_group(backend='nccl')) and ensure you’re using a distributed data sampler that splits the dataset among GPUs.
   • Model Parallel Example: If your model is too large for a single GPU, use libraries like SageMaker’s model parallel library, Megatron-LM, or DeepSpeed to partition the model across GPUs.

3. Handle I/O and Checkpoints

   • Read training and validation data from Amazon S3, Amazon FSx, or Amazon EFS.
   • Save checkpoints periodically so you can resume training if a job stops unexpectedly.

Best Practice

Make your training script stateless: Rely on external paths (usually S3) for data, model artifacts, and logs. This approach keeps your jobs more modular and robust.

5.2 Choose the Right Instance Types

• GPU-Optimized Instances: For deep learning, popular families include ml.p3 (NVIDIA V100 GPUs) and ml.p4 (NVIDIA A100 GPUs).
• Number of Instances:
  • Data Parallel: If the model fits on a single GPU but you have a large dataset, scaling out multiple instances can reduce training time.
  • Model Parallel: If the model is too large for one GPU, start by ensuring each “slice” of the model fits on its assigned GPU.
• Spot Instances (Optional):
  • Spot Instances can cut costs but come with the risk of interruption. SageMaker can resume from checkpoints if configured correctly.

5.3 Configure an Estimator in SageMaker

Using the SageMaker Python SDK, define an Estimator (for built-in algorithms) or a Framework Estimator (for PyTorch, TensorFlow, MXNet, etc.):

import sagemaker
from sagemaker.pytorch import PyTorch

# Create a SageMaker session
sagemaker_session = sagemaker.Session()

# Define the estimator
estimator = PyTorch(
    entry_point='train.py',  # Your training script
    role='YourSageMakerExecutionRole',
    instance_count=4,  # e.g., 4 instances for distributed training
    instance_type='ml.p3.2xlarge',
    framework_version='1.12',  # Example PyTorch version
    py_version='py38',
    hyperparameters={
        'epochs': 10,
        'batch_size': 128,
        'learning_rate': 0.001
    },
    # Distribution configuration (data parallel, model parallel, etc.)
    distribution={
        'pytorchx': {
            'enabled': True,
            'processes_per_host': 1
        }
        # Or with custom libraries like Horovod, or model parallel libraries
    },
    sagemaker_session=sagemaker_session
)

• entry_point: The Python script that SageMaker runs on each instance.
• instance_count and instance_type: Control how many compute resources are used.
• hyperparameters: Tune batch size, learning rate, and other training parameters.
• distribution: Enable distributed training settings (e.g., Horovod, native PyTorch distribution, or SageMaker’s model parallel library).

5.4 Point to the Training Data

Before launching your job, make sure your training data is uploaded to Amazon S3. You’ll pass these S3 paths to the fit method:

train_input = 's3://my-bucket/training-data/'
val_input   = 's3://my-bucket/validation-data/'

estimator.fit({
    'train': train_input,
    'validation': val_input
})

SageMaker automatically downloads this data onto each instance when the job starts.

5.5 Monitor Training Jobs

• CloudWatch Metrics: Track metrics like GPU utilization, CPU usage, and network throughput.
• SageMaker Logs: Examine logs in near real-time to see progress, debug issues, or watch for NaN losses.
• SageMaker Debugger: Optionally enable debugging to capture and analyze intermediate tensors.

5.6 Evaluate Results and Deploy

After the job finishes, SageMaker automatically saves model artefacts (e.g., model.tar.gz) to an S3 location specified in the estimator. You can:

1. Download the model for local testing or further experimentation.
2. Deploy to a SageMaker endpoint for real-time inference or to a batch transform job for offline predictions.

5.7 Cleanup

• Stop/Remove Endpoints: If you created real-time endpoints for inference, remember to delete them after you’re done.
• Terminate Idle Resources: Disable or remove any SageMaker notebooks or instances you no longer need.
• Automate: Consider using AWS Auto Scaling, lifecycle configurations, and scheduled jobs to manage computing more efficiently.

---

6. Leveraging Built-in Distributed Training Libraries

6.1 Parameter Server Architecture

A parameter server is a central process (or set of processes) that holds the global model parameters. Each worker node:

1. Pulls the latest parameters from the server,
2. Computes gradients on its subset of data,
3. Pushes those gradients back to the parameter server.

Pros & Cons

• Straightforward for moderate-scale data parallel approaches.
• Easy to conceptualize how updates flow between servers and workers.
• Potential bottleneck if many workers fight for the same server resource.
• Not as scalable at very large cluster sizes compared to AllReduce-based libraries.

How to Use Parameter Server on SageMaker

TensorFlow + Parameter Server Setup in Sagmaker

from sagemaker.tensorflow import TensorFlow

estimator = TensorFlow(
    entry_point='train_tf_ps.py',            # Your training script
    role='YourSageMakerExecutionRole',
    instance_count=4,                        # e.g., 4 instances
    instance_type='ml.p3.2xlarge',
    framework_version='2.8',                 # Example TF version
    py_version='py39',
    hyperparameters={
        'epochs': 10,
        'batch_size': 128,
        'learning_rate': 0.001
    },
    distribution={
        'parameter_server': {
            'enabled': True
        }
    }
)

estimator.fit('s3://my-bucket/training-data/')

6.2 Horovod (AllReduce-Based Approach)

Horovod, developed by Uber, uses an AllReduce strategy:

• Each GPU has a full copy of the model.
• Gradients are averaged across GPUs after each training step.

Pros & Cons

• Excellent Scalability: Proven to scale to very large GPU clusters.
• Framework-Agnostic: Works with TensorFlow, PyTorch, MXNet, etc.
• Minimal Code Changes: Often just a few lines to initialize Horovod, wrap your optimizer, etc.
• Network Bandwidth can become a bottleneck; requires high-performance interconnects for the best speed.
• Some additional steps to set environment variables and initialize processes (SageMaker can handle much of this for you).

How to Use Horovod on SageMaker

Pytorch & Horovod

from sagemaker.pytorch import PyTorch

estimator = PyTorch(
    entry_point='train_horovod.py',          # Training script with Horovod logic
    role='YourSageMakerExecutionRole',
    instance_count=4,
    instance_type='ml.p3.2xlarge',
    framework_version='1.12',
    py_version='py38',
    hyperparameters={
        'epochs': 10,
        'batch_size': 128,
        'learning_rate': 0.001
    },
    distribution={
        'mpi': {
            'enabled': True,
            'processes_per_host': 1,
            # Optionally set custom MPI/Horovod settings
            'custom_mpi_options': '-x HOROVOD_FUSION_THRESHOLD=16777216'
        }
    }
)

estimator.fit('s3://my-bucket/training-data/')

6.4 Other Approaches

• PyTorch DistributedDataParallel (DDP)
• SageMaker Data Parallel Library
• TensorFlow MirroredStrategy

6.5 Putting It All Together on SageMaker

1. Provision GPU clusters: Simply choose instance types (e.g., ml.p3.2xlarge, ml.p4d.24xlarge) and how many of them you want.
2. Enable the right distribution: In the Estimator’s distribution dictionary, specify parameter_server, mpi (Horovod), torch_distributed (optionally enabling DeepSpeed), or your framework’s native strategy.
3. Leverage advanced tooling:
   • SageMaker Debugger for analyzing gradients and spotting anomalies.
   • SageMaker Model Monitor and pipelines to automate MLOps tasks.
   • Spot Instances to reduce costs, combined with checkpointing to resume interrupted jobs.

---

1. Performance Tuning and Scaling Best Practices In large-scale machine learning, raw computational power alone is not enough. Efficient harnessing of that power can drastically reduce training times and costs. This section highlights proven strategies for improving training performance in Amazon SageMaker, including GPU utilization techniques, resource monitoring, scaling approaches, and cost-performance trade-offs.

7.1 Optimize GPU Utilization

Your GPUs represent a significant portion of your training budget. Therefore, keeping them as busy as possible—by ensuring minimal idle time—can dramatically impact both speed and cost. The following subsections detail specific tactics to maximize GPU throughput, from data loading to mixed precision and beyond.

7.1.1 Data Loading Efficiency

If your model sits waiting for the next batch, it's wasting precious GPU cycles.

1. **Use Parallel / Asynchronous Data Loading

   • PyTorch: Increase num_workers in your DataLoader, so CPU threads can prepare batches while the GPU is training.
   • TensorFlow: Chain .shuffle(), .batch(), and .prefetch() in your tf.data pipelines to overlap I/O and compute.

2. **Avoid I/O Bottlenecks

   • High-Throughput Storage: For large datasets while training, it is a good practice to use Amazon FSx for Lustre or instance stores (ephemeral NVMe SSDs) for faster access.
   • Optimized Data Formats: Use TFRecord (TensorFlow) or RecordIO (MXNet), or store multiple samples in single files to reduce overhead.

7.1.2 Mixed Precision Training

The most effective methods of accelerating GPU-bound workloads involve the effective utilization of half-precision (such as FP16 or BF16), generally doubling throughput with very little effect on model accuracy.

• Automatic Mixed Precision AMP
  • PyTorch: Use torch.cuda.amp for automatic scaling between FP16 and FP32 operations.
  • TensorFlow: Use tf.keras.mixed_precision.set_global_policy('mixed_float16').
• Hardware Acceleration: New generation GPUs (such as V100, A100) have native support for half precision in specialized tensor cores that.

7.1.3 Batch Size and Gradient Accumulation

Batch size defines the number of samples you process in one forward/backward pass.

• Large Batches
  • Fewer synchronization points in distributed training = more GPU utilization.
  • May require tuning your learning rate schedule to keep convergence quality.
• Gradient Accumulation
  • Store up gradients multiple mini-batches before performing the parameter update that simulates large batch sizes on GPU memory.

7.2 Monitor Resource Utilization

1. Amazon CloudWatch:

   • GPU Metrics: Memory usage, GPU utilization, throughput.
   • Alerts: Automatically trigger alerts if certain metrics drop/ increase from an expected threshold value.

2. SageMaker Logs & Debugger

   • Detailed Logs: Monitor training logs with near real-time granularity.
   • Profiler Reports: Summaries of CPU, GPU, disk, and network usage to see if the training loop is balanced.

7.3 Scale-Out Effectively

1. **Start Small, Scale Gradually

   • Test your code and perform hyperparameter tuning on a single instance.
   • Gradually increase the number of instances or the number of GPUs to find the sweet spot between speed and overhead.

2. Choosing the Right Instance

   • GPU-Optimized: ml.p3 or ml.p4 for Tensor Core acceleration.
   • High-Bandwidth Networking: EFA can help reduce inter-node communication latency.

3. Spot Instances

   • Save up to 70–90% compared to On-Demand, but handle preemptions using checkpointing.
   • Ideal for large parallel experiments or hyperparameter search.

7.4 Balancing Performance vs. Cost

1. Set Clear Budgets and Alerts

   • AWS Budgets/Cost Explorer: Track real-time spend and receive notifications.
   • Understand the cost per iteration of training to make informed decisions on scaling or advanced features.

2. Mixed Precision + Spot Instances

   • Together, these two can reduce training time and cost by an order of magnitude with very low risk.
   • Always checkpoint frequently so that in case of spot interruptions, recovery is easy.

3. **Hyperparameter Tuning and Early Stopping

   • SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning: Automatically performs the search for the best hyperparameters for your model to prevent you from spending any computer resources on settings that are not rewarding.
   • Early Stopping: Stop training when validation metrics flatten out.

---

8. Real-World Examples

You can apply these techniques to the following (but not limited to) real-world problems:

1. Global Media & Entertainment Recommender Systems
2. Financial Fraud Detection
3. Energy Demand Forecasting
4. Pharmaceutical & Genomics Research
5. SaaS AutoML Platform
6. EdTech Personalized Learning

---

Conclusion and Future Outlook

• Managed Infrastructure: SageMaker abstracts away much of the DevOps complexity, letting data scientists focus on innovation.
• Flexibility: Multiple frameworks (TensorFlow, PyTorch) and distribution libraries (Horovod, DeepSpeed, native DDP) let you tailor solutions to your exact needs.
• Cost Optimization: Spot Instances, auto-scaling, and advanced monitoring ensure efficiency without sacrificing performance.
• Visibility & Debugging: Tools like SageMaker Debugger and CloudWatch provide deep insights, making large-scale training more transparent and maintainable.

Comments

[Jason Dunn [AWS]]

Wow, what a great amount of detail in this article! Well done.