Meme Monday!
Today's cover image comes from last week's thread.
DEV is an inclusive space! Humor in poor taste will be downvoted by mods.
Meme Monday!
Today's cover image comes from last week's thread.
DEV is an inclusive space! Humor in poor taste will be downvoted by mods.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Alvaro Montoro -
Saami abbas Khan -
Niaxus -
Andrew Baisden -
Top comments (57)
The war begins 🤣
vs
🤪
My attempt at creating a meme last week...
Did you know that there is a maximum z-index value? For example a 10 digit 9 value (9999999999) is not possible, the maximum possible z-index is 2147483647. So if you have an item with z-index: 9999999999 and another with infinity, technically they both would be 2147483647 and the winner would be the one who is placed after the other in the HTML.
Thanks for the info bro
Because CSS doesn't allow to use the math constants outside of math functions... Which makes total sense.
Also, it would work with just
calc(infinity)
. I don't know why I added the* 1
. Out of habit maybe.I've recently started using custom properties for z-indices to simulate a kind of "named layers" and I don't think I'll ever go back to keeping the funny numbers in sync.
You know it! 😁 ✨
Even better.
Deleting other people's code completely because you’ve done it with two lines of code 🫣
Even better.
The "other people" is just you from a month ago and there was no reason not to do it the simple way back then other than you just didn't see it at the time.
Happens every time.
Any code I haven't touched in 15 minutes might as well be somebody else's!
Hahah, oh man! 😈
damn that feeling...
Today's comiCSS cartoon:
Let's kick things off with an awful AI-generated meme
My code is always well dodated.
My code is self-dodating
My code is no dodating
* saw an opportunity here and left to build first automated AI-based code dodator…
Amazing dodator :)
"Well dodated code"
This is priceless
Dodating code is so 1993.
that's gold
This Monday, time for a classic.
I still sometimes call Control, Catarol.
Laughs in #include
Laughs in C#
What it does effectively is disallow obtaining a reference to the field, thus preventing idiotic side effects.
record Foo(int number);
Done I fixed it for you 😎 (except that it not Mutable). so you got to create a new Record every time data changes. Bu other than that it's a nice feature in Java.