While this was seen as an opportunity to quit by some users, some reported increased tobacco use due to increased stress. Of the 219 (34%) tobacco users who quit tobacco during the lockdown, 51% quit because of the lockdown and their concern over COVID-19. Abstinence among those who were aware of the association between the coronavirus and tobacco was twice that among those who were not aware.
Awareness activities about the harmful effects of tobacco during the coronavirus pandemic have to be strengthened. Measures to motivate and support tobacco users to quit have to be provided through cessation services.
Awareness activities about the harmful effects of tobacco during the coronavirus pandemic have to be strengthened. Measures to motivate and support tobacco users to quit have to be provided through cessation services.
Smoking rates remain disproportionately high among Chinese immigrants in the US, particularly in males. Community-based smoking cessation services and quitlines have low engagement rates. Social media and text messaging programs can be effective in promoting quit rates and improving treatment engagement. This study examined Chinese immigrant smokers' barriers to accessing available smoking cessation services and patterns of using social media platforms and mobile phone text messaging.
We conducted in-depth interviews (n=30) and a brief survey (n=49) with adult Chinese immigrant smokers leaving in New York City in 2018. Qualitative interviews explored smokers' challenges with smoking cessation, barriers to accessing and using smoking cessation services, and experience using social media and text messaging. The quantitative survey assessed smoking and quitting behaviors, and social media and text messaging use patterns.
Qualitative data revealed that participants faced various barriers to accessing cessatoking cessation treatment.
Tobacco use is a major risk factor for cancer and other non-communicable diseases and is the single largest cause of preventable deaths worldwide causing premature death. find more There are various laws and legislations for tobacco control in India. The Cigarettes and Other Tobacco Products Act (COTPA) 2003 was enacted in 2004 but is not enforced rigorously. The aim of this study was to determine any violation of COTPA Section 4 (prohibition of smoking in public places) around educational institutions and Section 6b (prohibition of sale of tobacco products near educational institutions).
A cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in 307 schools and colleges selected across 12 districts in 5 states in India. Data were collected by the tobacco control coordinators. From the centre of the city, the coordinators travelled in four different directions to a maximum distance of 10 km radius. Along the path, any educational institutions that were encountered were surveyed for violation of COTPA Sections 4 and 6b.
Out of 307 schools surveyed across the five states, an average of 85% of the schools violated Section 4 and an average of 69% violated Section 6b.
A coordinated effort by all stakeholders, especially by the police, educational institutions, and the community, is required. Adherence to the guidelines on Tobacco-Free Educational Institutions can improve the implementation of COTPA in and around educational institutions.
A coordinated effort by all stakeholders, especially by the police, educational institutions, and the community, is required. Adherence to the guidelines on Tobacco-Free Educational Institutions can improve the implementation of COTPA in and around educational institutions.
Patterns of youth tobacco use, including use of multiple products, have likely shifted as e-cigarettes have grown in popularity. However, there is limited understanding of dual and poly tobacco use and the associated disparities, especially among Appalachian youth.
We analyzed Youth Appalachian Tobacco Study data (n=1116) to estimate prevalence of current (past-30 day) cigarette, e-cigarette, and smokeless tobacco use by gender, race/ethnicity, age, school type, state, smartphone use, and number of household tobacco users. We created a pattern of tobacco use variable (i.e. never, former, single, dual, poly) based on all possible combinations of the included products. Using multivariable multinomial logistic regression (outcome reference never use), we evaluated associations between sociodemographic characteristics and patterns of tobacco use.
Former (16.2%) was the most common tobacco use group, followed by single (10.8%), dual (4.5%), and poly (2.4%) use. Dual and poly use were more prevalent among males, Whites/Caucasians, older participants, and participants living in households with tobacco users. Kentucky residents (vs New York) had higher odds of dual use (OR=5.15; 95% CI 1.72-15.44), and youth who used smartphones for ≥20hours/week (vs <20 hours/week) had greater odds of poly use (OR=3.02; 95% CI 1.34-6.80).
Differences in single, dual, and poly tobacco use were evidenced by sociodemographic characteristics. Additional inquiry should further examine these disparities so that tobacco prevention interventions can be appropriately tailored.
Differences in single, dual, and poly tobacco use were evidenced by sociodemographic characteristics. Additional inquiry should further examine these disparities so that tobacco prevention interventions can be appropriately tailored.Smoking remains one of the leading risk factors contributing to the global burden of disease. Sub-optimal implementation of evidence-based tobacco control and smoking cessation practice is a major challenge despite a substantial evidence base for interventions to increase smoking cessation globally. We aim to develop an Evidence and Gap Map (EGM) to collate the existing evidence and identify the gap in research on interventions to increase smoking cessation worldwide. A conceptual framework was developed followed by the formulation of a search strategy with key search terms and search period (1970 - date of search). The search will be conducted in relevant bibliographic databases (e.g. MEDLINE, Embase, SCOPUS), systematic reviews databases (e.g. Cochrane Library, Joanna Briggs systematic reviews, EPPI-Reviewer) and impact evaluation databases (e.g. 3ie Impact Evaluation repository and Cochrane tobacco addiction group specialized register) with support from a research librarian. Subsequently, two coders will screen and retrieve systematic reviews and individual impact evaluation studies.find more
Top comments (0)