DEV Community

Cover image for Cryptocurrency Rug-Pull Scams: A Comprehensive Analysis
Donald Johnson
Donald Johnson

Posted on

Cryptocurrency Rug-Pull Scams: A Comprehensive Analysis

#cryptocurrency #programming

1. Technical Deep Dive

How Rug-Pulls Occur Programmatically: Rug-pull scams typically involve malicious smart contracts that appear to operate normally but contain hidden backdoors. Developers exploit these code vulnerabilities to seize funds or trap investors' tokens. For example, a token’s code may prevent anyone but the creator from selling. In the notorious Squid Game (SQUID) token scam, the token’s smart contract was rigged so that only the developers could sell, while all other holders were blocked (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights) (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). When the price spiked due to investor demand, the developers cashed out their holdings, draining the liquidity pool and causing the token’s price to plummet to near zero in seconds (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). Investors were left holding tokens they could not sell, exemplifying how a “honeypot” mechanism works.

Smart Contract Vulnerabilities Enabling Rug-Pulls: Malicious developers often embed functions that give them outsized control over token supply and trading dynamics: 

  function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public {
      // ... normal transfer checks ...
      if (msg.sender == owner) {
          // Backdoor: give owner full supply again
          balance[owner] = totalSupply;
      }
      // proceed with transfer...
  }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

In the above snippet, whenever the owner invokes transfer(), their balance is reset to the totalSupply (Detecting Rug-Pull: Analyzing Smart Contract Backdoor Codes in Ethereum), effectively giving them an infinite supply to sell. This type of hidden mint function was observed in real scams and devalues the tokens held by others (Detecting Rug-Pull: Analyzing Smart Contract Backdoor Codes in Ethereum) (Detecting Rug-Pull: Analyzing Smart Contract Backdoor Codes in Ethereum).

  mapping(address => bool) frozen;
  function setFrozen(address user) public onlyOwner {
      frozen[user] = true;
  }
  function transfer(address to, uint256 amount) public {
      require(!frozen[msg.sender], "Transfers from this account are blocked");
      // ... normal transfer logic ...
  }
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

Such code ensures victims cannot sell or withdraw their tokens, while the owner can freely dump holdings (Detecting Rug-Pull: Analyzing Smart Contract Backdoor Codes in Ethereum) (Detecting Rug-Pull: Analyzing Smart Contract Backdoor Codes in Ethereum). The Squid Game token contract contained exactly these kinds of checks, locking out buyers from selling (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). Similarly, the WarOnRugs scandal saw the developer set token transaction fees to 100%, making any sale by others effectively impossible while he siphoned value via a backdoor (‘War on Rugs’ Crypto Watchdog Group Has Exit Scammed You For Your Own Good, It Claims - AiCoin).

Legitimate Appearance vs Hidden Exploits: Skilled rug-pull developers make their contracts appear legitimate by following standard token standards and perhaps even passing basic audits, all while burying exploits in complexity or conditional logic. They might use verified source code on explorers to seem transparent but obfuscate the malicious part (e.g., hiding a malicious condition in a lengthy function or in an inherited library). Some even modify popular libraries like OpenZeppelin’s SafeMath or use assembly to hide unintended behavior (What Is a Crypto Rug Pull? - DeFi Exploits Explained). For instance, “hidden mint” code could be tucked into a less-scrutinized function or only activate under specific circumstances (like only after a certain block time, or only callable by the deployer). In practice, developers may also simply not renounce contract ownership or deploy new code via proxies, giving them the flexibility to rug at will once investors’ money is in. To the average investor, the project looks normal—tokens can be bought and show up in wallets, a website and roadmap exist, and maybe even a superficial audit is posted. But the moment the trap is sprung (owner calling the secret function, or removing liquidity, etc.), the built-in exploit executes and users realize the horror: the code itself was the scam.

2. Geographic and Demographic Analysis

Where Are Rug-Pulls Orchestrated? Rug-pull scammers leverage the borderless nature of crypto, operating from all over the world. It is often challenging to pinpoint their true locations because perpetrators hide behind anonymous identities and routing of funds (Top Five Countries in Crypto crime annual report 2022 - Coincub). However, some major cases give clues to geographic hotspots. For example, one of the largest alleged rug-pulls was the Turkish exchange Thodex, whose CEO Faruk Fatih Özer vanished in 2021 with an estimated $2 billion in user funds (Crypto Crime Trends for 2022: Illicit Transaction Activity Reaches All-Time High in Value, All-Time Low in Share of All Cryptocurrency Activity - Chainalysis). (He was later arrested and convicted in Turkey’s courts.) In South Africa, the founders of Africrypt, Ameer and Raees Cajee, reportedly disappeared after a $3.6 billion crypto platform collapse in 2021 (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). OneCoin, a Ponzi-style crypto scam based in Bulgaria, drew in billions from investors worldwide before its leader Ruja Ignatova fled – she’s now on the FBI’s Most Wanted list (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). In India, schemes like GainBitcoin and BitConnect were orchestrated or promoted by locals (GainBitcoin’s mastermind Amit Bhardwaj and BitConnect’s founder Satish Kumbhani), defrauding victims of billions collectively (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In) (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). These examples illustrate that large-scale crypto scams have been run out of Europe, Africa, and Asia. North America has seen its share as well – e.g., some recent NFT rug-pull scammers were based in the U.S. (such as the pseudonymous creators of the Frosties NFT project in Los Angeles) (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters) (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters). Overall, no single region holds a monopoly on rug-pulls. Scammers tend to emerge wherever cryptocurrency activity is thriving and enforcement is perceived as lax. Loosely regulated markets with many new crypto adopters can be attractive bases for these operations.

User Demographics Most Affected: Rug-pull victims span the globe, but patterns have emerged in who is most likely to fall prey. Typically, new and inexperienced crypto investors are disproportionately affected (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High) (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). During bull markets or hype cycles, many first-time investors enter the market chasing quick gains, making them prime targets. Scammers exploit FOMO (fear of missing out), luring in users with promises of huge returns or the next “moonshot” token. Younger investors active on social media forums (Telegram groups, Twitter crypto communities, Reddit, TikTok) are frequently exposed to these scam promotions. That said, rug-pull victims are not exclusively novices or young people – even more seasoned crypto enthusiasts can be duped if the scam is sophisticated (for example, if it mimics a legit DeFi protocol or NFT project effectively). Retail investors looking for “the next big thing” in DeFi or meme coins are common targets. Often, affected users exhibit high-risk investment behavior: aping into (i.e. hurriedly buying) new tokens without thorough research, trusting anonymous developers because of flashy marketing, or being seduced by extraordinarily high APYs and rewards. Scammers also tend to hit communities that are easily reachable online – for instance, there was a spate of scam tokens targeting fans of trending pop culture (like Squid Game, Mando tokens for Star Wars fans, etc.), indicating they aimed at mainstream audiences drawn in by familiar themes. Demographically, crypto ownership skews male and between 20-40 years old, and this group likely constitutes a large share of rug-pull victims as well, though data on exact demographics is limited. Ultimately, anyone drawn in by the hype and lack of due diligence can be a victim – rug-pulls “pull the rug” from under unsuspecting investors regardless of location or age.

Known Groups and Individuals Behind Rug-Pulls: While many rug-pull perpetrators remain anonymous, some aliases and groups have become notorious in the crypto community. The example of War On Rugs (WoR) stands out – WoR was a watchdog group that ironically turned rogue. Its leader, known by the alias “Shappy,” built a reputation calling out scams, then launched his own tokens (like Fairmoon and RETH) which he rug-pulled in 2021 (‘War on Rugs’ Crypto Watchdog Group Has Exit Scammed You For Your Own Good, It Claims - AiCoin) (‘War on Rugs’ Crypto Watchdog Group Has Exit Scammed You For Your Own Good, It Claims - AiCoin). Shappy exploited the trust of ~100,000 followers, ultimately siphoning over $2 million in value via backdoors (such as setting transaction taxes to 100% to trap others’ funds) (‘War on Rugs’ Crypto Watchdog Group Has Exit Scammed You For Your Own Good, It Claims - AiCoin). Another notable figure is Faruk Fatih Özer of Thodex (mentioned above), who orchestrated one of the largest crypto exit scams from Turkey (Crypto Crime Trends for 2022: Illicit Transaction Activity Reaches All-Time High in Value, All-Time Low in Share of All Cryptocurrency Activity - Chainalysis). In the DeFi space, there have been “serial” rug-pull scammers: for instance, analysis on Binance Smart Chain uncovered a single scammer responsible for dozens of rug-pull tokens in mid-2022, netting over $2 million by repeatedly launching and abandoning projects (ISACA Now Blog 2022 Mapping a Serial Rug Pull Scammer on Binance Smart Chain) (ISACA Now Blog 2022 Mapping a Serial Rug Pull Scammer on Binance Smart Chain). These scammers often use repeating patterns but new token names, making them somewhat identifiable through on-chain analysis even if their real identity is hidden. Law enforcement actions have unmasked a few individuals: the U.S. Department of Justice charged Ethan Nguyen (“Frostie”) and Andre Llacuna (“heyandre”) for the Frosties NFT rug-pull (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters) (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters), and Le Anh Tuan for the Baller Ape NFT rug-pull (a $2.6M scam affecting thousands of investors, in which he was caught in 2022). In the ICO era, the founders of BitConnect (a global Ponzi which collapsed in 2018) were publicly identified and indicted – Satish Kumbhani is facing up to 70 years in prison according to U.S. authorities (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Ruja Ignatova of OneCoin, dubbed the "Cryptoqueen," remains at large years after defrauding millions of people (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Additionally, some hacking groups (like North Korea’s Lazarus Group) have been linked more to crypto exchange hacks than rug-pulls, but broadly, organized crime is recognizing the low risk, high reward nature of rug-pulls. In summary, the actors behind rug-pull scams range from lone anonymous developers, to organized teams using pseudonyms, to even publicly known founders who decide to betray user trust. They operate across jurisdictions, which makes prosecuting them difficult – but notable arrests (in the U.S., Turkey, India, etc.) show that authorities are starting to catch up with these fraudsters.

3. Patterns and Trends

Frequency and Scale: Rug-pulls have evolved into a dominant crypto scam type in recent years. In 2021, rug-pulls exploded alongside the DeFi boom – accounting for 37% of all crypto scam revenue that year (about $2.8 billion stolen), versus just 1% of scam revenue in 2020 (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). Chainalysis noted that rug pulls became the “go-to scam” of DeFi, with hundreds of new tokens and projects created purely to defraud (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). The sheer number of incidents has been staggering. By late 2024, rug-pull scams were occurring almost daily; one cybersecurity report recorded a peak of 31 rug-pulls in a single day (Nov 14, 2024) (DeFi rug pull surge reveals more complex crypto scam strategies). Fortunately, many of these were smaller schemes (losses under $100k each) – but their cumulative impact is significant, e.g. about $15 million lost to rug-pulls in just one month around that peak (DeFi rug pull surge reveals more complex crypto scam strategies). This trend of many small grifts indicates scammers are favoring quantity, launching numerous low-effort token scams, rather than only a few big heists. That said, outlier events still occur: a handful of big rug-pulls (like Thodex’s $2B exit or Africrypt’s multi-billion loss) skew the statistics, meaning the median rug-pull is much smaller than the headline-grabbing cases.

Timing and Market Conditions: There is a strong correlation between bull markets and scam activity. Historically, scam frequency spikes during crypto bull runs or hype phases. For instance, the ICO boom of 2017-2018 and the DeFi summer of 2020 saw waves of rug-pulls riding the surge of new investors (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). During bull runs, rising asset prices and media attention bring in inexperienced investors, providing fertile ground for scammers (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). We saw scams peak after Bitcoin/Ethereum price run-ups in 2017 and late 2020 (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). However, interestingly, by 2021 this correlation started to weaken – even as crypto prices climbed, the total value stolen in scams leveled off (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). One theory is that scam lifespans shortened: scammers hit fast and vanish quicker, instead of running long cons. Data supports this – the average lifespan of a crypto financial scam in 2021 was just 70 days, down from 192 days in 2020 (Crypto Scams: 2021 Rug Pulls Put Revenues Near All-Time High). Rug-pull projects now often last only weeks or even days before the creators execute the exit, reflecting a “smash-and-grab” mentality. There may also be a seasonal element: toward year-end 2021, enforcement actions increased and crypto prices fluctuated, possibly causing some scammers to lie low or shift tactics. In late 2022 and 2023, during the bear market, outright rug-pull volumes appeared to decline (less new investment flowing in to exploit), but by 2024 with new mini-bull cycles (e.g. memecoin crazes) the rug-pulls resurged in smaller forms (DeFi rug pull surge reveals more complex crypto scam strategies). In summary, rug-pull scams thrive when optimism and speculation are high, and they tend to cluster around hype cycles – whether that hype is the general market or specific fads.

Common Triggers and Themes: Scammers often piggyback on trending themes to attract victims. Social media trends heavily influence rug-pull launches. For example, the Squid Game token rug-pull was timed with the viral popularity of the Squid Game show, using its name and imagery to garner attention (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights) (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). Similarly, countless scam tokens have referenced popular memes, games, or celebrities (e.g. Mini Tesla, Baby Yoda coin, etc.) to appear relatable. A pattern has been observed where immediately after any pop culture phenomenon or crypto meme takes off, a flurry of token contracts are created with related names – many of which turn out to be rug-pulls. Social media marketing is the engine of these scams: Telegram pump groups, Twitter shilling by bots or paid promoters, Reddit posts, and even TikTok videos are used to create buzz. The projects typically showcase flashy websites and buzzword-filled whitepapers that promise things like “revolutionary DeFi utility” or “NFT integration” without meaningful detail (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). They also instill a sense of urgency (“presale ends in hours,” “don’t miss the next 100x!”) to get FOMOing investors to buy quickly (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Another trend is the use of fake endorsements or name-dropping – scam tokens often falsely claim support from tech founders or crypto influencers, or they simply copy the branding of successful projects (e.g., innumerable fake Shiba Inu or Uniswap clones).

On-chain analysis trends show that scammers have adapted to detection efforts by using multiple wallets and obfuscation. Instead of holding all scam tokens in one developer wallet (which would be an obvious red flag if that wallet holds, say, 50% of supply), modern rug-pullers split the supply across dozens of wallets to make the holder distribution appear more decentralized (DeFi rug pull surge reveals more complex crypto scam strategies). They might also distribute small amounts to many wallets to simulate “community interest” or use bots to create the illusion of active trading. This makes it harder to assess risk by simple metrics like a rich list or top-holder concentration (DeFi rug pull surge reveals more complex crypto scam strategies). Cross-chain tactics are another trend: scammers may launch on easier-to-use chains (BSC, Tron, etc.), then swap and bridge stolen funds across chains and into privacy mixers like Tornado Cash to launder their proceeds (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights) (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). This complicates tracking and reflects a growing sophistication.

Seasonal or Event-based Patterns: Aside from general bull runs, rug-pull activity often spikes around periods of crypto mania (e.g., the NFT boom of 2021–2022 saw many NFT rug-pulls). Notably, late 2021 brought many DeFi token rugs on Binance Smart Chain when BSC was experiencing explosive growth due to low fees – scammers took advantage of the influx of new BSC users. Holiday seasons or year-end might also see increased scams, possibly because people are more distracted or looking for year-end “moonshots.” Some analysts also point out that scams can surge when legitimate crypto projects are doing airdrops or new launches – scammers set up similarly named tokens to confuse users (for instance, during Uniswap’s UNI token airdrop, fake “Uni” tokens surfaced). However, these patterns can be unpredictable.

Social Media and Website Trends: The playbook for scam promotion has become quite standardized. It starts with aggressive marketing on Twitter and Telegram. Scammers often create a Telegram channel with thousands of botted members to fake a thriving community. They release constant bullish news updates and memes on Twitter, tag trending topics, and often buy retweets or enlist micro-influencers to hype their coin. Websites for rug-pull projects tend to look polished at first glance but often have copied or low-quality content – e.g., generic templates, stolen graphics, or team sections with fake names and AI-generated profile pictures. Frequently, the project’s roadmap and whitepaper (if any) are absurdly ambitious (e.g. promises of a new exchange, a metaverse game, and a charity initiative all within a few months) yet lack substance – a red flag pattern (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Rug-pulls also leverage buzzwords heavily: “community-driven,” “next Shiba,” “locked liquidity” (sometimes falsely claimed), etc., to sound legitimate. On-chain, one trend is that the scam token’s contract is sometimes not verified or is copy-pasted from another project with one or two tweaks (which can be discovered by code similarity tools).

Another modern pattern is scammers launching on decentralized launchpads or using stealth launches to avoid immediate scrutiny. They might do a small private sale or a fake “fair launch” (with themselves as the primary liquidity providers) and then push it public. Time-of-day patterns can even be seen: some rug-pulls execute late at night or during weekends (UTC time) when developer activity might be less noticed by the community or when oversight (by, say, exchange staff or auditors) is minimal.

In conclusion, rug-pull scams have shown adaptive trends: they flourish in periods of hype, they’re growing in number but often shrinking in individual size, and scammers are using more sophisticated social engineering and technical obfuscation to ensnare victims. Staying alert to these patterns – such as unrealistic marketing, uneven token distribution, unusual code features, and hype with no fundamentals – is critical for anyone navigating the crypto markets.

4. Case Studies of Notorious Rug-Pulls

  • OneCoin (2014–2016): Often cited as one of the largest crypto scams ever, OneCoin was essentially a Ponzi scheme masquerading as a cryptocurrency. Based out of Bulgaria, it purported to be the next Bitcoin, attracting over $4 billion from millions of investors worldwide. In reality, there was no actual blockchain behind OneCoin. Founder Ruja Ignatova disappeared in 2017 with the loot, and she remains a fugitive on the FBI’s Most Wanted list (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Impact: OneCoin’s collapse left countless victims (many from Europe, Asia, and Africa) with huge losses and shattered trust. It sparked global investigations; several lower-level participants were arrested, but Ignatova is still at large. User response: The scale of OneCoin’s fraud galvanized law enforcement; it serves as a cautionary tale that not all “cryptos” are real.

  • BitConnect (2016–2018): BitConnect started as a lending platform with its own BCC token, promising outrageous daily returns via an automated “trading bot.” It became a multi-billion dollar global Ponzi. At its peak, BitConnect’s market cap exceeded $2.5 billion. In early 2018, the scheme collapsed – the creators pulled the plug, and the BCC token’s price went to nearly zero. An estimated $2.4 billion was taken from investors worldwide (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Aftermath: BitConnect’s Indian founder Satish Kumbhani has since been indicted in the U.S. for fraud, facing up to 70 years in prison (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). A famous meme video of a BitConnect promoter’s rant (“BitConnneeeect!”) became symbolic of the mania and gullibility of that era. User response: Many investors joined class-action lawsuits. The collapse also triggered regulatory warnings about crypto lending schemes.

  • Thodex Exchange (2021): Thodex was a Turkish cryptocurrency exchange that suddenly halted withdrawals in April 2021. Its CEO, Faruk Fatih Özer, disappeared overnight, allegedly taking $2 billion in user funds with him (Crypto Crime Trends for 2022: Illicit Transaction Activity Reaches All-Time High in Value, All-Time Low in Share of All Cryptocurrency Activity - Chainalysis). This incident is considered a rug-pull because the exchange functioned normally until Özer literally vanished with the cold wallets. Aftermath: Turkish authorities arrested dozens of people connected to Thodex and eventually caught Özer in Albania in 2022. In 2023, a Turkish court handed him an astonishing 11,196-year prison sentence (a symbolic harsh punishment) for fraud. User response: Over 390,000 users were affected (Thodex - Wikipedia), leading to public outrage in Turkey. It highlighted the risks of unregulated exchanges and prompted Turkey to tighten crypto oversight.

  • Africrypt (2021): Africrypt was a South African crypto investment platform run by two young brothers (Ameer and Raees Cajee). In mid-2021, they announced the platform was “hacked” and all funds lost, then the brothers vanished. It’s suspected they orchestrated an exit scam, absconding with as much as $3.6 billion in Bitcoin (though some estimates vary) (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). If true, this is one of the largest alleged rug-pulls by value. Aftermath: South African authorities and international investigators have been trying to trace the funds. The brothers, through lawyers, denied wrongdoing. The incident spurred calls in South Africa for stricter crypto regulations. User response: Many victims were wealthy South African investors; some hired private investigators. The case remains partly unresolved, showing how mega-scams can entangle legal processes for years.

  • Squid Game Token (SQUID, 2021): A DeFi memecoin inspired by Netflix’s Squid Game show, it grabbed headlines for its meteoric rise and crash. Launched in late October 2021, SQUID attracted thousands of retail buyers, driving the price from mere pennies to a peak of ~$2,860 per token – a 40,000% increase (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). However, when people tried to sell, they discovered the token was a trap: the developers had coded it so that only they could sell (a classic honeypot). In early November, the creators sold off their holdings and pulled the rug, sending SQUID’s price from $2,860 to effectively $0 within minutes (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). Roughly $3 million of investor funds were drained in the dump ("Squid Game" crypto coin promoters vanish with investor millions in ...). Aftermath: The scam was widely covered by media (BBC, CNBC, etc.) as a stark example of DeFi mania gone wrong. The developers, who had used fake identities, vanished. TRM Labs later traced some of the funds and linked the SQUID dev wallets to other scams, suggesting this wasn’t their first rug-pull (On the Trail of the Squid Game Scammers | TRM Insights). User response: Victims rallied on social media, but with an anonymous team there was little recourse. The incident became an object lesson in smart contract due diligence, as even basic checks would have revealed the sell restriction code.

  • Compounder Finance (2020): An early DeFi rug-pull case. Compounder Finance was a yield farming protocol that lured users with high returns on staked tokens. Unbeknownst to investors, the developers had inserted a malicious backdoor in the smart contract. In December 2020, after accumulating around $10 million in user deposits, the devs triggered the backdoor to withdraw all the funds from the pools, promptly tumbling the token value to $0. Aftermath: The DeFi community noted that the project’s code was unaudited – a red flag ignored by yield-chasers. Some funds were traced to exchanges, but the anonymous devs were never caught. This case underlined the importance of code audits and trusting only battle-tested protocols.

  • Frosties NFT Rug Pull (2022): Not only tokens, but NFTs saw rug-pulls too. Frosties was a 2022 collection of cute ice cream creature NFTs. The project sold out, raising about $1.1 million from buyers, with promises of metaverse integration and rewards (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters). Immediately after the sale in January 2022, the founders abandoned the project and tried to launder the funds – the classic rug-pull move (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters) (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters). However, in this case U.S. law enforcement was watching: by March 2022, the two 20-year-old founders (Ethan Nguyen and Andre Llacuna) were arrested in Los Angeles and charged in what became the first federal criminal case against an NFT rug-pull (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters) (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters). Aftermath: Their arrest sent a strong message to NFT scammers. The duo had reportedly been preparing a second rug-pull (another NFT collection) when caught (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters). User response: The Frosties community, though rug-pulled, saw a form of justice as the perpetrators were caught before they could run far. This case gave hope that authorities can track blockchain crimes despite pseudonymity.

  • Baller Ape Club Rug Pull (2022): Another NFT rug-pull, where the creator of “Baller Ape Club” NFTs rug-pulled after mint, stealing about $2.6 million in proceeds. In June 2022, the U.S. Justice Department indicted Le Anh Tuan, a Vietnamese national, for this scam and related money laundering. It highlighted that even flashy NFT avatar projects could be outright frauds. Aftermath: This was part of a broader DOJ crackdown that year (they announced charges in multiple crypto fraud schemes together). The case is ongoing, but it underscores international reach in crypto crime (Vietnam to U.S.).

(These are just a few examples among many. There have also been numerous smaller rug-pulls in the form of meme tokens, DeFi rug-pulls on BSC/ETH, and even failed exchange platforms. Each incident further educates the community about red flags and the need for caution.)

5. Preventative Measures and Safeguards

Due Diligence and Red Flags: The best defense for investors is vigilant research before putting any money into a new crypto project (CirculateBUSD Hack Analysis — Have you ever been rug pulled? | by Shashank | SolidityScan). Here are key steps and warning signs to help detect potential rug-pulls:

  • Check the Team’s Transparency: Are the developers anonymous? Rug-pulls often have no verifiable team or a fake team. Lack of a credible, public team with a history in the community should raise alarms. If a project claims well-known founders, verify those individuals actually endorse it (scammers have impersonated developers before).

  • Examine the Project’s Promises: Be wary of projects promising guaranteed outsized returns or a roadmap that seems too good to be true (e.g., massive plans in a very short time frame) (What Is a Rug Pull, Exactly? | Built In). Unrealistic returns and vague, hype-filled language (“next 1000x coin!”) are common in scams. Legitimate projects typically are transparent about risks and have detailed technical docs, not just marketing buzz.

  • Token Distribution and Liquidity: Analyze the token’s holder distribution on a block explorer before investing. If a few wallets (especially the deployer or developer wallets) hold an overwhelming majority of the supply, that’s a danger sign (CirculateBUSD Hack Analysis — Have you ever been rug pulled? | by Shashank | SolidityScan). Similarly, check that the liquidity is locked or burned – many legitimate projects lock their liquidity pool tokens in a timelock contract or burn them, to assure investors the developers cannot rug the liquidity. If you can’t verify a liquidity lock or if the project refuses to provide proof of it, be extremely cautious. Also, look at the number of holders: a very low number of holders (or many dummy holders created at the same time) could indicate an insular scheme prone to an exit scam (CirculateBUSD Hack Analysis — Have you ever been rug pulled? | by Shashank | SolidityScan).

  • Smart Contract Red Flags: If you have the ability, review the smart contract code (or find someone who can). Red flags include: owner-only functions that can mint tokens, blacklisting or pausing functions, extremely high transferable fees, proxy upgrade functions, or anything that would allow unilateral control (ISACA Now Blog 2022 Mapping a Serial Rug Pull Scammer on Binance Smart Chain) (ISACA Now Blog 2022 Mapping a Serial Rug Pull Scammer on Binance Smart Chain). Even without reading code, one can use automated tools (discussed below) to scan for these vulnerabilities. If the contract isn’t verified on Etherscan/BSCScan, that’s another red flag – why would a legitimate project hide their code?

  • Community and Behavior: Assess the project’s community channels. Is the Discord/Telegram full of bots or overly cult-like behavior (everyone spamming “when moon” and mods banning tough questions)? Scam projects often censor any skepticism. If the devs are not responsive to technical questions or only post memes and marketing updates, that’s a bad sign. Also, extensive marketing without substance – e.g., constant Twitter hype but no Github code or demo – is a pattern for rug-pulls (Rug Pulls: Your Complete Guide | Koinly). Legit projects typically have some product or at least open development progress.

  • External Audits and Reviews: While not a guarantee, having an independent smart contract audit from a reputable firm (and making the report public) is a positive sign. Most rug-pulls skip audits entirely, or they use fake audit certificates. Always verify an audit’s authenticity by checking the auditor’s site. Also look for community-driven reviews – often, crypto users or analysts will warn others on Reddit or Twitter if they spot something fishy in a new project’s code or behavior. A quick search for the project name plus “scam” can sometimes reveal prior warnings.

Tools and Techniques for Analysis: Several tools can help investors preemptively spot scams:

  • Smart Contract Scanners: Services like SolidityScan’s QuickScan and others can automatically analyze a token’s code for known scam patterns (CirculateBUSD Hack Analysis — Have you ever been rug pulled? | by Shashank | SolidityScan). These scanners check for things like unlockable mint functions, honeypot logic, heavy developer ownership, etc., and then generate a risk report. For example, TokenSniffer is a popular free site where you can input a token’s contract address and it will report a “sniff test” result, flagging issues such as: liquidity not locked, contract similarity to known scams, developer holding >5% supply, blacklist functions present, etc. If a token scores poorly on such a tool, steer clear.

  • Blockchain Explorers: One can manually use explorers like Etherscan/BSCScan to investigate token activity. Check the contract code (under the “Contract” tab on Etherscan) for suspicious functions (look for keywords like owner, mint, burn, fee, maxTx). Use the Token Tracker page to see the top holders and any recent large transfers. If you see the creator address making big transfers or if liquidity pool tokens (LP tokens) are held by a normal address (meaning liquidity not locked), that’s a danger sign. Also, check if there are many transactions sending the token to the null address (0x0) — that could indicate liquidity being pulled or tokens being burned in a misleading way.

  • Honeypot Testers: There are community-built tools (and even simple scripts) that attempt a honeypot test. Essentially, these tools will simulate a buy and a sell of the token in question; if the sell fails (or the required gas for sell is extremely high), the tool will report that the token is likely a honeypot (cannot be sold). Websites like honeypot.is or rugdoc.io have functions to test a token for sellability. Always do such a test with a small amount if you try it manually – send a tiny amount of the token to a fresh wallet and attempt to sell it back; if you cannot, that token is a trap.

  • Social Media and Web Forensics: Do a quick due diligence on the project’s web presence. Perform an image search of the team’s photos (they might be stolen images) or check domain registration info for the project’s website (if it was registered very recently or with an opaque registrar, be cautious). On social media, see if the accounts promoting the project were created recently or have few followers (indicating they might be dummy accounts). Look for pattern of spam – if you see the same shill messages across many groups, it’s orchestrated. There are also bot-detection tools that can show if a Telegram group has a suspiciously high ratio of members to active chat, etc.

Community and Industry Efforts: The crypto community has developed its own rapid-response mechanisms to combat rug-pulls. Websites like Web3rekt and Rekt Database maintain updated lists of known scam tokens and exploits, which can be a reference to check if a project has shady links (ISACA Now Blog 2022 Mapping a Serial Rug Pull Scammer on Binance Smart Chain) (ISACA Now Blog 2022 Mapping a Serial Rug Pull Scammer on Binance Smart Chain). Some developers have created blacklist databases of scam addresses (for example, Etherscan will mark certain addresses with warnings if they’re known scammers). Rug-pull survivors often share their experiences on forums to warn others. Following reputable crypto researchers and security auditors on Twitter (X) can provide early warnings – often when a project is suspected of foul play, word spreads quickly among the community (“Crypto Twitter”). Additionally, the rise of decentralized verification platforms – for instance, RugDoc for BSC projects – helps investors by reviewing new project contracts and flagging risks (Understanding Rug Pulls: How to Detect, Avoid, and Respond).

On the industry side, centralized exchanges have gotten stricter in reviewing tokens before listing, which helps keep blatant scam tokens off major exchanges (most rug-pulls happen on DEXs where listing is permissionless). Law enforcement is also stepping up: the U.S. DOJ formed a Cryptocurrency Enforcement Team focusing on scams, and we’ve seen more arrests and indictments, which may deter some scammers (Two U.S. men arrested for $1 mln non-fungible token 'rug pull' scheme | Reuters). In some jurisdictions, rug-pulls are being explicitly defined as fraud, meaning victims can report and possibly initiate legal action.

Investor Safeguards: As an investor, beyond research, practice good risk management: never put in more than you can afford to lose in highly speculative tokens, and consider using stop-loss strategies where possible. Spread out your investments – don’t go all-in on a new project. If you suspect you’re in a rug-pull (e.g., price starts free-falling or developers go silent), sometimes the best move is to exit early if you still can, even at a loss, to salvage some funds – because once the rug is fully pulled, recovery is near impossible. Keep records of project communications and transactions; if a rug-pull does occur, having that evidence can help any investigation or at least serve to warn others. Finally, support and rely on the community: often, collective wisdom on forums can sniff out scams quickly. If multiple experienced users flag a project, take it seriously. In crypto’s Wild West, skepticism is healthy – assume every new project could be a scam until you have solid reasons to believe it’s legit. By combining technical tools, community insights, and old-fashioned caution, investors and developers alike can better protect themselves against the scourge of rug-pull scams.

Top comments (0)

Read next

zackch profile image

Python 3.13 No-GIL: What You Need to Know

zakaria chatouane -

mateuscechetto profile image

Understanding Method Hiding and Overriding in C#: A Real-World Problem Solved

Mateus Cechetto -

lokeshjoshi profile image

How AI Helps Reduce False Positives in Cyber Threat Detection?

Lokesh Joshi -

minwook profile image

torch.compile vs torch.export

제민욱 -