When you need a file storage solution, Amazon's Elastic File System (EFS) can sometimes be a better fit than S3:
πExplore more at: https://dotnet-fullstack-dev.blogspot.com/
π Sharing would be appreciated! π
POSIX Compliance π₯οΈ: EFS is fully POSIX-compliant, making it ideal for applications requiring shared file systems across multiple EC2 instances, such as web servers and application servers.
Low-Latency Access β‘: EFS provides lower latency than S3, especially when accessing small files, making it preferable for file-system-like workloads with frequent I/O.
Automatic Scaling π: EFS automatically scales as files are added, ensuring no capacity planning worries.
File Locking π: EFS supports file locking natively, making it suitable for applications needing multi-instance access without conflicts (e.g., database files).
β οΈ Note: For archiving or object storage, S3 remains more cost-effective.
Top comments (0)