Given the various ways in which the infamous this
keyword can be altered in JavaScript (global, functions, arrow functions, classes, objects, etc.) it’s not surprising that somewhere along the way functionality started appearing that helps alter the calling context, and thus the value of this
. Three particular functions that have appeared to help are Call, Apply and Bind, and there’s a reason that I list them in that order.
Call
Think of Call as being like saying “I’d like to call something, but I’d like to provide my own context for where it gets called”. This makes a lot of sense when you look at objects and classes. Take the following example:
What we’re doing here is that we’re taking the toyotaHilux
object, which has no beepHorn()
method, and using it as the context for a call to the fordFocus
object’s beepHorn()
method. It’s kind of like saying, “Hey fordFocus
, pretend you’re toyotaHilux
for a second, and then call that great beepHorn()
method of yours”.
In addition to the context we provide to Call, we can also provide some parameters to be passed to the target method, like so:
Apply
Think of Apply as being like Call, but with the ability to supply parameters to the target function as an array rather than standard parameters. Otherwise, it’s more or less identical:
Now you may be wondering why the parameters are supplied as an array. The reason for this is that as Apply could be called on a function with no parameters, 2 parameters or even 427 parameters, it makes it much more manageable to pass it an array of parameters instead.
Interestingly, this additional functionality over Call also provides us with another feature: the ability to call functions with an array of parameters. Here’s an example:
As you can see we have a simple addition function which takes 2 parameters. The way we’re calling it however is to use Apply, supplying no context (as there’s no use of this
), and then providing an array of parameters to be passed. Apply then handles converting this array into traditional parameters, and calls the function. I’ve also included an attempt to call the function with the array without using Apply to demonstrate what happens normally.
Now just for completeness sake, you might be wondering how this technique performs if the array of parameters provided is bigger or smaller than the parameters the function is expecting. Well the answer is that if you don’t provide enough parameters, the missing ones will be become undefined
(unless you declare a default value in the function declaration), and if you provide too many it’ll just chop off the excess. Here’s an example:
Now this isn’t necessarily the best way to convert an array to parameters, but it’s a common one you’ll see on coding challengers, and it’s an interesting case of taking something that’s been designed for one purpose, and using it for something completely different.
Bind
Think of Bind as being like a re-usable version of Call. You declare a variable, and then bind it to the target function, with an optional target context, and provide some optional parameters, and then you can call it whenever you want.
Let’s first look at an example of binding with a context provided:
As you can see, it’s basically the same as a Call, but re-usable.
Now let’s look at an example of Bind that supplies some parameters:
Finally let’s bring everything together by binding to a function and supplying both context and parameters:
As you can see, the boundInflateToyotaTyre
variable is bound to calling the inflateTyre
method of the fordFocus
object, but using the toyotaHilux
context.
Note: I’d be remiss if I didn’t point out that the more helpful use-case for Bind in this example would be to bind without the parameters, so they can be specified at call time, such as in the following example:
Top comments (0)