Contributing to open source projects can be an exciting and rewarding experience. However, newcomers (and sometimes even experienced developers) often make mistakes that can lead to frustration, rejected pull requests, or even conflicts within the community. In this post, we'll explore ten common pitfalls to avoid when contributing to open source repositories.
1. Not Reading the Contribution Guidelines 📚
Many projects have a CONTRIBUTING.md file or a dedicated section in their README that outlines the process for contributing. Skipping this crucial step can lead to wasted effort and rejected contributions.
Do this instead: Always start by reading the project's contribution guidelines. They often contain valuable information about coding standards, commit message formats, and the pull request process.
💡 Pro Tip: Set up a checklist for yourself when starting with a new project. Make "Read CONTRIBUTING.md" the first item on that list.
2. Submitting Large, Complex Pull Requests
Massive changes in a single pull request can be overwhelming for maintainers to review and more likely to introduce bugs.
Do this instead: Break down your contributions into smaller, focused pull requests. This makes it easier for maintainers to review and merge your changes.
# Instead of one large commit:
git commit -m "Implement new feature X with 1000+ lines of changes"
# Break it down:
git commit -m "Add basic structure for feature X"
git commit -m "Implement core functionality of feature X"
git commit -m "Add error handling for feature X"
git commit -m "Write tests for feature X"
3. Failing to Communicate with Maintainers 🤐
Jumping straight into coding without discussing your plans can lead to misaligned expectations and wasted effort.
Do this instead: Open an issue to discuss your proposed changes before starting work. This ensures your contribution aligns with the project's goals and direction.
📦 Useful Resource: Many projects use issue templates. Look for a "Feature Request" or "Proposal" template when opening a new issue.
4. Ignoring Project Coding Standards
Each project has its own coding style and conventions. Ignoring these can lead to inconsistent code and time-consuming revision requests.
Do this instead: Familiarize yourself with the project's coding standards and use appropriate linting tools.
# Bad: Inconsistent naming conventions
def calculateTotal(items_list):
return sum(items_list)
# Good: Following Python naming conventions (assuming project uses snake_case)
def calculate_total(items):
return sum(items)
5. Not Testing Changes Thoroughly 🧪
Submitting code without proper testing can introduce bugs and create more work for maintainers.
Do this instead: Write and run tests for your changes. Many projects have specific commands for running tests locally.
# Common test commands (check project documentation for specifics)
npm test # For Node.js projects
python -m pytest # For Python projects
go test ./... # For Go projects
💡 Pro Tip: Set up continuous integration (CI) in your fork of the repository. This can automatically run tests on your branches before you create a pull request.
6. Neglecting Documentation Updates 📝
Changing functionality without updating relevant documentation leads to confusion for users and other contributors.
Do this instead: Update documentation alongside your code changes. This includes inline comments, README files, and any external documentation.
7. Duplicating Existing Issues or Pull Requests 🔍
Creating new issues or pull requests without checking if they already exist can waste time and clutter the project.
Do this instead: Search through existing issues and pull requests before creating new ones. If you find a similar issue, consider contributing to the existing discussion instead.
📦 Useful Resource: GitHub's search syntax can help you find existing issues more effectively. Try searching for keywords in both the title and body of issues.
8. Making Unrelated Changes in a Single Commit 🎭
Combining multiple unrelated changes in one commit makes it difficult to understand the history and potentially revert specific changes.
Do this instead: Keep your commits focused and atomic. Each commit should represent a single logical change.
# Bad: Mixing unrelated changes
git commit -m "Fix bug in login form and update color scheme"
# Good: Separate, focused commits
git commit -m "Fix validation error in login form"
git commit -m "Update color scheme to match new brand guidelines"
9. Poor Commit Messages
Vague or uninformative commit messages make it hard for maintainers and other contributors to understand the purpose of your changes.
Do this instead: Write clear, concise commit messages that explain the what and why of your changes.
# Bad
git commit -m "Fix stuff"
# Good
git commit -m "Fix race condition in user authentication process"
💡 Pro Tip: Consider using a commit message template. You can set one up in your git config to ensure consistency across your commits.
10. Lack of Patience and Follow-up ⏳
Open source maintainers are often volunteers with limited time. Getting impatient or failing to respond to feedback can lead to your contributions being overlooked or rejected.
Do this instead: Be patient, respectful, and responsive. Follow up on your pull requests and be open to feedback and suggestions for improvements.
📦 Bonus Resource: Consider using a tool like Conventional Commits to standardize your commit messages. Many projects appreciate this structured approach.
By avoiding these common mistakes, you'll greatly increase your chances of making valuable contributions to open source projects. Remember, every successful contributor was once a beginner. Stay curious, be willing to learn, and don't be afraid to ask for help when needed. Happy contributing! 🎉
Remember: Open source is about collaboration and continuous learning. Your contributions, no matter how small, can make a significant impact on the project and the community. Keep coding, keep learning, and keep sharing! 💻🌟
Top comments (0)