Photo by Niels Kehl on Unsplash
In the ever-evolving world of front-end development, styling solutions have been a hot topic for years. While CSS-in-JS solutions like Styled Components and Emotion have gained popularity in React applications, SCSS (Sass) remains a powerful and efficient way to style applications.
If youβre wondering which approach to choose for your next project, letβs dive deep into the pros and cons of SCSS vs. CSS-in-JS and why SCSS might still be the better choice in 2025! π₯
1. What is SCSS? π‘
SCSS is a preprocessor for CSS that extends its capabilities by adding features like variables, nesting, mixins, and functions. It makes writing styles more maintainable and scalable.
Example of SCSS:
$primary-color: #007bff;
.button {
background-color: $primary-color;
padding: 10px 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
color: white;
font-weight: bold;
transition: background 0.3s;
&:hover {
background-color: darken($primary-color, 10%);
}
}
This simple SCSS example defines a button style with a primary color variable, nesting, and a hover effect.
2. What is CSS-in-JS? π¨
CSS-in-JS is a styling approach where CSS is written inside JavaScript. Some popular libraries include Styled Components and Emotion.
Example of Styled Components:
import styled from 'styled-components';
const Button = styled.button`
background-color: #007bff;
padding: 10px 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
color: white;
font-weight: bold;
transition: background 0.3s;
&:hover {
background-color: darken(#007bff, 10%);
}
`;
export default function App() {
return <Button>Click Me</Button>;
}
While it looks similar to SCSS, there are fundamental differences under the hood. Letβs analyze both approaches in depth.
3. Pros of SCSS β
π₯ Better Performance
SCSS is precompiled, meaning styles are generated at build time, leading to better runtime performance. CSS-in-JS generates styles dynamically, which can impact page load times and re-rendering performance.
π― Separation of Concerns
SCSS keeps styles separate from JavaScript logic, promoting cleaner and more maintainable code. With CSS-in-JS, styles are tightly coupled with components, which can lead to bloated files.
π Faster Development with Mixins & Functions
SCSS offers powerful mixins and functions that eliminate redundant code. Example:
@mixin button-style($color) {
background-color: $color;
padding: 10px 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
color: white;
font-weight: bold;
}
.button-primary {
@include button-style(#007bff);
}
.button-secondary {
@include button-style(#6c757d);
}
4. Cons of SCSS β
π Requires a Build Step
Since SCSS needs to be compiled to CSS, a build tool like Webpack or Vite is required.
β³ No Dynamic Styles
SCSS cannot generate styles dynamically at runtime like CSS-in-JS can. If you need styles that change based on props, youβll have to use CSS variables or additional class toggling.
5. Pros of CSS-in-JS β
π¨ Scoped Styles by Default
CSS-in-JS avoids style conflicts by scoping styles automatically to components.
π§βπ» Dynamic Styling with Props
Styled Components allows you to pass props and generate styles dynamically:
const Button = styled.button`
background-color: ${props => props.primary ? '#007bff' : '#6c757d'};
`;
π¦ No Additional Build Step Needed
Since styles are generated at runtime, no preprocessor is required.
6. Cons of CSS-in-JS β
π’ Performance Overhead
Generating styles at runtime can slow down rendering, especially in large applications.
π Larger Bundle Size
CSS-in-JS solutions increase JavaScript bundle size since styles are included in JS files.
π€― Harder to Debug
Since styles are dynamically generated, debugging and overriding styles in DevTools can be more complex compared to traditional CSS/SCSS.
7. Conclusion π―
Both SCSS and CSS-in-JS have their use cases, but SCSS remains a strong choice for many React applications due to its better performance, maintainability, and ease of debugging. If you want scoped styles with dynamic capabilities, CSS-in-JS can be helpful, but the trade-offs in performance and bundle size must be considered.
π Best of Both Worlds? You can even use SCSS for global and reusable styles while leveraging CSS-in-JS selectively for truly dynamic styling needs.
Whatβs your preferred styling approach? Letβs discuss in the comments! π¬
Top comments (0)