Your LLM prototype amazed everyoneâuntil it didnât. Now itâs stuck, and no oneâs using it. Hereâs why.
When most companies experiment with AI, the go-to application is a chatbot. Itâs intuitive, it looks impressive, and it feels like magic. But hereâs the cold, hard truth: chatbots are why most LLM projects fail.
Iâve seen it happen countless times. The team builds a chatbot to âharness AI,â and at first, it wows everyone. But then the cracks start to show:
- Users are frustrated. The chatbot gives incomplete answers or none at all.
- Adoption stalls. People revert to their old workflows.
- The project drags on, with no measurable impact.
Eventually, the chatbot gets shelved. The technology gets blamed. The lesson learned? âAI isnât ready yet.â
Wrong.
The problem isnât AI. The problem is that youâve fallen into the chatbot trap.
Letâs break down whatâs going wrongâand how to finally get your LLM project unstuck.
Why Most LLM Projects Fail After the Prototype
1. Youâre Building a Tool, Not Solving a Problem
Think about it: Why did your team decide to build a chatbot? Chances are, the conversation started with, âWe need to use AI,â instead of, âWhat pain point are we solving?â
Hereâs the truth: users donât care about chatbots. They care about results. They want outcomes that make their work easier, faster, or less frustrating.
Take this example:
- A consulting team is buried under a mountain of documents. They want to retrieve information faster.
- Someone suggests, âLetâs build a chatbot so they can ask questions and get answers!â
- A prototype is built. It kind of works, but itâs clunky. Users struggle to phrase questions correctly, and the answers arenât specific enough.
- After months of iteration, the chatbot fizzles out. Users move on. The team is back to square one.
What went wrong? No one stopped to ask, âWhat outcome does the user actually want?â
In this case, the consultants didnât want to chatâthey wanted structured, actionable insights. Imagine if the AI automatically generated a report with key information upfront:
- No back-and-forth.
- No guessing how to phrase the question.
- Just the answers.
Suddenly, the AI is solving the real problem. And as a bonus, itâs much simpler to build and measure.
2. Open Systems Create Chaos
Chatbots let users ask anything. Sounds great, right? Until you realize the chaos it creates.
- What questions will users ask?
- How will they phrase them?
- What edge cases will they uncover?
This lack of constraints makes chatbots an open systemâand open systems are a nightmare to measure or improve. How do you evaluate success when the scope is infinite?
You canât.
Compare that to a closed system, like generating a predefined report or extracting specific data. In a closed system:
- You know exactly what the output should be.
- You can measure accuracy, recall, and completeness.
- And because you can measure it, you can improve it.
Hereâs the rub: Chatbots feel magical, but from an engineering perspective, theyâre chaos.
3. Chatbots Set Users Up for Disappointment
When you give someone a chatbot, youâre promising: âAsk me anything, and Iâll give you the perfect answer.â
But what happens when the chatbot responds with:
- âIâm sorry, I donât understand that.â
- âI canât help with that.â
Users get frustrated. Trust is destroyed.
Now imagine a simpler, clearer solutionâa button labeled âGenerate Reportâ or a dashboard that delivers exactly what the user needs. Expectations are set upfront, and the experience feels seamless.
Hereâs the rule: The simpler the solution, the clearer the expectationsâand the better the user experience.
How to Escape the Chatbot Trap
If your LLM project is stuck, itâs time to rethink your approach. The key? Shift your mindset from âbuild something impressiveâ to âdeliver outcomes that matter.â
Hereâs how:
1. Start with the Problem
Ask yourself:
- What pain point are we solving?
- What outcome does the user actually need?
If your answer starts with, âWeâre building a chatbot,â stop. Chatbots are tools, not outcomes.
2. Constrain the Scope
Avoid the temptation to build something that can âdo it all.â Narrow your focus:
- What specific task will the AI handle?
- What wonât it handle?
Smaller scope = less complexity = faster success.
3. Build Closed, Measurable Systems
Focus on systems with clear boundaries:
- Automatically summarize documents.
- Generate predefined reports.
- Extract specific data.
Closed systems are:
- Easier to measure.
- Faster to improve.
- More likely to deliver value.
When Is a Chatbot the Right Solution?
Letâs be clear: Chatbots arenât useless. In narrow, well-defined use cases, they can work brilliantly. But those use cases are the exception, not the rule.
Before building a chatbot, ask:
- Whatâs the scope? Can we define clear boundaries?
- Whatâs the expectation? Will users understand its limitations?
- Whatâs the outcome? Are we solving a real, measurable problem?
In most cases, a simpler, structured solution will deliver more value, faster.
The Bottom Line: Users Want Outcomes, Not Tools
If your team is stuck in the chatbot trap, hereâs the harsh truth: people donât care about your chatbot. They care about getting the information they needâquickly, easily, and with zero friction.
So, instead of chasing flashy, complex tools:
- Deliver a report with exactly what they need.
- Build a dashboard that surfaces key insights in seconds.
- Focus on outcomes, not interfaces.
When you do this, two things happen:
- Users love it. They trust the solution because it delivers value.
- You can measure success. And if you can measure it, you can improve it.
AI doesnât need to feel magical to be valuable. The best AI solutions often feel simpleâlike they âjust work.â
If your LLM is stuck in the chatbot trap, letâs get it back on track. Iâve helped teams rethink their AI strategy and deliver real, measurable results. Drop me a message, and letâs talk.
Top comments (0)