Redis vs Memcached: Which In-Memory Data Store Should You Use?

When building applications that demand lightning-fast data retrieval, caching is a game-changer.

Among the top contenders for caching solutions are Redis and Memcached.

While they share many similarities, the subtle differences can significantly impact your system’s performance and scalability.

But which one should you use?

Is Redis the shiny new tool that makes Memcached obsolete? Or does Memcached still have a place in modern development? Let’s dive deep and make an informed decision.

The Basics: What Are Redis and Memcached?

Memcached

• What it is: A simple, high-performance, distributed memory caching system.
• Primary use case: Caching key-value pairs to reduce database load.
• Key features:
  • Atomic get/set/delete operations.
  • Automatic expiration of old items using LRU (Least Recently Used) eviction.
  • Multithreaded architecture for better CPU utilization.
  • Scales linearly with available RAM.

Redis

• What it is: An advanced in-memory data structure store.
• Primary use case: Caching, but also much more (e.g., message brokering, real-time analytics, etc.).
• Key features:
  • Supports rich data types like strings, hashes, lists, sets, and sorted sets.
  • Persistence (can save data to disk).
  • Transactions and atomic operations.
  • Built-in support for clustering and high availability.
  • Single-threaded (but still blazingly fast).

Similarities: What Both Redis and Memcached Offer

If you’re primarily using Redis as a cache, the differences between the two become less obvious. Here’s what both Redis and Memcached provide:

• Atomic get/set/delete operations: Both ensure that read and write operations are performed safely without race conditions.
• Sub-millisecond latency: Expect extremely fast responses, making them suitable for high-performance applications.
• Memory-based storage: Data is stored in RAM, enabling quick access and retrieval.
• Automatic expiration: Both support time-to-live (TTL) configurations to evict old data automatically.
• Scalability: Both can scale in line with your system’s RAM.
• Clustering support: Both can be clustered for horizontal scaling.

So, if the basics are covered, what sets them apart? Let’s get into the details.

Key Differences Between Redis and Memcached

1. Memory Management

🔹 How Memcached Organizes Memory

Memcached follows a slab allocation strategy.

When you start Memcached, you allocate a fixed amount of RAM (to the nearest MB).

It then divides memory into pages, slabs, and chunks:

• Pages (default 1 MB) are the basic unit of memory allocation.
• Slabs are assigned to each page based on the size of incoming items.
• Chunks within slabs store individual cached objects.

This means if a slab is dedicated to storing 80-byte objects, all chunks in that slab will be 80 bytes, even if a smaller object is stored—leading to wasted space due to internal fragmentation.

🔹 How Redis Organizes Memory

Redis, on the other hand, does not pre-allocate memory like Memcached.

Instead, it dynamically allocates memory per item stored using malloc.

As items are added and removed, Redis memory can become fragmented, leading to wasted space.

To combat this, Redis now uses jemalloc, which reduces fragmentation but doesn’t eliminate it.

Additionally, Redis includes a background defragmentation process to optimize memory usage over time.

Summary: Memcached’s slab allocation reduces fragmentation but can waste space due to fixed chunk sizes.

Redis dynamically allocates memory but suffers from fragmentation, mitigated by jemalloc and background defragmentation.

2. Threading and Scalability

🔹 Memcached: Multi-threaded

Memcached supports multi-threading, meaning it can handle multiple operations in parallel across CPU cores.

This makes it highly efficient for read-heavy workloads and horizontal scaling.

🔹 Redis: Single-threaded (but optimized)

Redis is mostly single-threaded, but don’t let that fool you. Because Redis uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model, it can process tens of thousands of requests per second.

Recent versions of Redis also support multi-threaded I/O to improve read performance under high loads.

Summary: Memcached scales well across multiple CPU cores, while Redis leverages efficient event-driven processing and multi-threaded I/O in newer versions.

3. Feature Set and Use Cases

If you're only using caching features, you might not need Redis’s extra capabilities. However, Redis offers much more than just caching:

Feature	Redis	Memcached
Data Types	Strings, Lists, Sets, Sorted Sets, Hashes	Strings Only
Persistence	Optional disk persistence (RDB & AOF)	No persistence (RAM only)
Transactions	Yes (MULTI/EXEC commands)	No
Pub/Sub Messaging	Yes	No
Lua Scripting	Yes	No
Geospatial Indexing	Yes	No
Bitmaps & HyperLogLogs	Yes	No

Redis is a multi-purpose in-memory data store, while Memcached is a lightweight, high-speed cache with fewer features.

4. Persistence and Durability

Memcached is purely a cache—it does not persist data.

If the service is restarted, all cached data is lost.

Redis, however, supports persistence via:

• RDB (Redis Database): Snapshots data at set intervals.
• AOF (Append-Only File): Logs every write operation for durability.

If persistence is important, Redis wins by default.

Performance: Is One Faster Than the Other?

Both Redis and Memcached are extremely fast, with sub-millisecond latency. However, there are some nuances:

• Redis: Single-threaded, so it’s limited to one CPU core. However, it’s highly optimized and can handle hundreds of thousands of operations per second.
• Memcached: Multithreaded, so it can scale across multiple CPU cores. This makes it better for highly concurrent workloads.

In most cases, the performance difference is negligible. The choice should be based on features and use case, not raw speed.

Which One Should You Choose?

-> Choose Memcached:

Memcached is simpler and more focused. Here’s where it shines:

1. Simplicity

If all you need is a fast, distributed cache for key-value pairs, Memcached is hard to beat. It’s lightweight and easy to set up.

2. Multithreading

Memcached is multithreaded, meaning it can utilize multiple CPU cores. This makes it a better choice for workloads that require high concurrency.

3. Predictable Memory Usage

Memcached allocates a fixed chunk of memory upfront and manages it using a slab allocator. This reduces fragmentation and makes memory usage more predictable.

4. LRU Eviction

Memcached uses LRU (Least Recently Used) eviction by default, which is simple and effective for most caching use cases.

-> Choose Redis :

Redis is a superset of Memcached, meaning it can do everything Memcached can and more. Here’s why you might choose Redis:

1. Rich Data Types

Redis supports more than just strings. You can store:

• Hashes: Perfect for storing objects (e.g., user profiles).
• Lists: Great for queues or timelines.
• Sets: Ideal for unique collections (e.g., tags).
• Sorted Sets: Useful for leaderboards or priority queues.

2. Persistence

Redis can save data to disk, making it a real database rather than just a cache. This is useful if you want your cache to survive restarts.

3. Advanced Features

• Pub/Sub: Redis can act as a message broker.
• Lua Scripting: Execute complex logic server-side.
• Geo Support: Store and query geographic data.
• Transactions: Bundle multiple operations into a single atomic unit.

4. Better Memory Management

Redis uses jemalloc to allocate memory dynamically, which reduces fragmentation. It also has a built-in defragmentation tool to clean up "holes" in memory.

5. Ecosystem and Support

Redis has a larger ecosystem, with tools like Redis Sentinel for high availability and Redis Cluster for horizontal scaling. It’s also better documented and has more active community support.

Final Thoughts

Both Redis and Memcached are excellent choices, but your decision should be based on your specific use case rather than popularity or perceived “coolness.”

If you just need a fast, simple, multi-threaded cache, Memcached might be all you need.

But if you’re looking for flexibility, persistence, and advanced data structures, Redis is the clear winner.

At the end of the day, it’s not about which tool is newer or better supported—it’s about choosing the right tool for the job.

What’s your experience with Redis and Memcached? Let’s discuss in the comments below! 🚀

I’ve been working on a super-convenient tool called LiveAPI.

LiveAPI helps you get all your backend APIs documented in a few minutes

With LiveAPI, you can quickly generate interactive API documentation that allows users to execute APIs directly from the browser.

If you’re tired of manually creating docs for your APIs, this tool might just make your life easier.