For decades, GPG (GNU Privacy Guard) has been the go-to tool for secure messaging, signing, and encryption. But let’s be honest—GPG is a pain to use. Key management is clunky, revocation is a mess, and for the average user, it's just too complicated.
But what if we had something simpler, more flexible, and designed for the modern internet?
Nostr’s subkey model could provide a better, decentralized alternative to GPG while keeping the core benefits: strong cryptographic identity, multi-device support, and easy verification.
👉 Full subkeys specification: Nostr Subkeys Proposal
🔑 What Makes GPG a Pain?
GPG works, but it suffers from:
- Complicated Key Management – Exporting, importing, and backing up keys is a hassle.
- No Native Multi-Device Support – You either copy your private key (bad idea) or manually set up subkeys.
- Difficult Revocation & Recovery – If your key is lost, good luck convincing your contacts to update.
- Keyservers Are a Mess – Syncing keys and verifying trust requires third-party infrastructure.
- Awful UX – Even power users struggle with the interface and workflow.
GPG was built for a different era. Nostr’s built-in cryptographic identity model gives us a chance to rethink how we handle signing, encryption, and trust in a way that’s simpler and more user-friendly.
🚀 How Nostr Subkeys Could Replace GPG
1. Cryptographic Identity Without the Hassle
With Nostr, your identity is just a public key (npub), and all messages/events are signed using your private key (nsec). No complex keyservers, trust chains, or manual verifications needed—signatures are in-band and self-verifying.
2. Built-In Multi-Device Support
GPG forces you to manually create subkeys if you want to use multiple devices securely. Nostr, on the other hand, can natively support subkeys, where:
- Each device gets its own subkey.
- The master key delegates authority to subkeys, proving they belong to the same identity.
- Clients automatically verify subkeys without needing keyservers.
🔹 GPG: Export/import keys manually → hope your contacts update
🔹 Nostr: Subkeys are linked to your master key and discoverable automatically
3. Simple, Fast Revocation & Rotation
GPG key revocation is a nightmare—if a key is compromised, you have to:
- Publish a revocation certificate (which most people never generate in advance).
- Hope everyone actually updates their keyrings.
With Nostr subkeys, revocation is instant and automatic:
- If a device is lost or compromised, just remove its subkey from your profile (
kind:0). - Clients will immediately stop trusting the revoked subkey.
- No need to rely on external keyservers or out-of-band revocation mechanisms.
→ Faster, simpler, and no outdated trust issues.
4. Decentralized, No Keyservers Required
GPG relies on centralized keyservers (which are often slow, unreliable, or even censored).
Nostr, by design, is relay-based—meaning:
- Public keys and signatures are naturally distributed across multiple relays.
- Users can self-host their own relays or use multiple public ones.
- There's no single point of failure, making censorship much harder.
🔹 GPG: Trust centralized keyservers (hope they work)
🔹 Nostr: Just use relays—they handle distribution
5. Lightweight, Modern, and Web-Native
GPG was built in the 1990s for a world of email and command-line cryptography. It doesn’t fit well with modern web applications, mobile devices, or decentralized protocols.
Nostr natively works with the web:
✅ It’s API-driven
✅ Works with any app that can verify signatures
✅ Can be used for chat, document signing, and authentication
✅ Requires no complicated installs or CLI commands
→ A signing/encryption system that actually fits how people use the internet today.
🔮 What Could a Nostr-Based GPG Replacement Look Like?
Instead of gpg --sign myfile.txt, imagine:
-
Signing a message by posting a
kind:4event - Encrypting a file by using NIP-44 (Nostr’s built-in encryption)
- Verifying someone’s signature by checking their Nostr identity and delegation
This isn’t just theoretical—all the building blocks exist today in Nostr. With a bit of tooling, we could make signing and encryption as easy as sending a Nostr note.
🔗 GPG vs. Nostr Subkeys: The Comparison
| Feature | GPG (Legacy) ❌ | Nostr Subkeys (Modern) ✅ |
|---|---|---|
| Multi-Device Support | ❌ Manual setup, hard to sync | ✅ Automatic subkeys for each device |
| Revocation | ❌ Painful, requires external servers | ✅ Instant, just update your profile |
| Key Discovery | ❌ Requires keyservers | ✅ Relays distribute public keys naturally |
| Ease of Use | ❌ Complex CLI, manual imports | ✅ Just sign events like any Nostr note |
| Decentralization | ❌ Trusts keyservers | ✅ Fully decentralized, relay-based |
| Web & App Friendly | ❌ Not native to modern apps | ✅ Nostr works in browsers, mobile apps, and more |
🌍 A Future Without GPG?
GPG isn’t going away tomorrow—it’s deeply embedded in many systems. But for people looking for a modern, decentralized alternative, Nostr’s subkey model could be simpler, stronger, and better suited for the web.
With a little development, we could make Nostr subkeys the default way to sign, encrypt, and verify identities—without any of GPG’s pain points.
GPG had its time. Maybe it’s time for something better. 🚀
What’s Next?
Interested? Let’s build it. Drop into Nostr dev discussions and let’s start shaping a true GPG alternative—one that’s decentralized, easy to use, and works everywhere.
👉 Nostr isn’t just for social media—it could be the future of cryptographic identity. 🔑
Top comments (0)