DEV Community

Cover image for Serverless MapReduce for Excel: Scale Your Marketing Data with AWS
Oleksandr Hanhaliuk
Oleksandr Hanhaliuk

Posted on

Serverless MapReduce for Excel: Scale Your Marketing Data with AWS

Introduction

MapReduce is a programming model for processing large datasets in parallel. It splits the input data into chunks (Map), then combines or aggregates results (Reduce).

  • Map: Break down data into smaller parts.
  • Shuffle/Sort: Group related data.
  • Reduce: Aggregate or combine into final results.

Let's learn the Map-Reduce pattern with a real-world example: Event-Driven Serverless “MapReduce” AWS Architecture for Excel-Based Marketing Campaign Analytics.

1. Overview

If you’re dealing with Excel sheets full of marketing metrics (e.g., campaigns, CPC, revenue), this AWS serverless pipeline helps process and aggregate data automatically—no cluster management needed.

Key Steps:

  1. Upload Excel: A marketing manager uploads a spreadsheet to an Amazon S3 bucket.
  2. Map Lambda: Parses each row (date, campaign, source, cost, etc.) and saves intermediate results.
  3. Reduce Lambda: Aggregates partial data into a final report for analytics or dashboards.

2. Architecture Flow

AWS Architecture

  1. Excel File Upload: The marketing manager or an automated process places the Excel file into an S3 bucket.
  2. Map Lambda: Triggered by an S3 event. It reads and parses each row, storing partial outputs in S3.
  3. Reduce Lambda: Triggered by a subsequent event or schedule. Collects all partial results, aggregates them, and writes the final report to S3 or a database.

3. Step-by-Step

Sequence diagram

  1. User uploads an Excel file with marketing data to an S3 bucket.
  2. Map Lambda is triggered by an S3 event, processes each row, and stores intermediate data.
  3. Reduce Lambda aggregates data across different marketing sources into a final report.
  4. The processed report can be stored in S3 or used for visualization.

4. Key Benefits

Serverless: No servers or clusters to maintain.

Cost-Effective: Only pay for Lambda execution and minimal S3 usage.

Automated Data Ingestion: Triggers when an Excel file is uploaded.

Decoupled Architecture: Easily modify or extend each step.

5. Next Steps

  • Add validation/error handling in the “Map” phase for missing columns or invalid data.
  • Implement notifications (e.g., email or Slack) when final reports are generated.
  • Integrate with dashboard tools (e.g., QuickSight) to visualize aggregated marketing metrics.

6. Example Transformation Flow

Below is a simple example of how a single row from the Excel file is transformed during the Map step, and then combined in the Reduce step.

🔹 Input Excel Row

Input Excel

🔹 Map Output (Intermediate JSON)

{
  "date": "2025-01-07",
  "campaign": "WinterSales",
  "source": "Google AD",
  "impressions": 19394975,
  "clicks": 3878995,
  "cost": 8533789,
  "orders": 46935900,
  "revenue": 89216885,
  "cpc": 2.2
}
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

📂 (This might be stored in an S3 path /{date}/campaign/.)

🔹 Reduce Step
If there are multiple entries for the same date and campaign (e.g., different sources like SEO, Social, etc.), the Reduce Lambda will sum or aggregate values across all partial outputs.

🔹 Example Final Excel Report

Date,Campaign,TotlImpressions,TotalClicks,TotalCost,TotalOrders,TotalRevenue
2025-02-07,WinterSale,30000,500,340.0,16,1120.0
Enter fullscreen mode Exit fullscreen mode

(Here, we combined data from AdWords, SEO, and other sources for WinterSale on 2025-02-07.)

7. Why Not Just Use Excel for Data Transformation?

For small, ad-hoc data tasks, Excel works. But a serverless, automated approach is ideal when you:

🚀 Need consistent transformations across multiple or frequently updated files.
📈 Require scalability (large datasets slow Excel and risk data limits).
📊 Want integration with dashboards, notifications, or further data pipelines.
🔍 Value version control and repeatable, automated processes.

8. What About AWS Glue?

🔹 AWS Glue
A fully managed ETL service, built on Apache Spark.
✅ Great for big data & complex transformations.
✅ Schema discovery & automatic scaling.
❌ More overhead than Lambda-based solutions.

🔹 Lambda-Based MapReduce
🚀 Lightweight and cost-effective for small-to-medium datasets.
✅ Easier to set up for frequent, structured Excel processing.
✅ You fully control the transformation logic.

Bottom Line:
If your datasets are huge or you need advanced ETL features, AWS Glue is better.
For lighter, serverless jobs, a Lambda-based MapReduce approach is simpler and cheaper.

💡 Would you like a tutorial on deploying this architecture step-by-step? Drop a comment!
🚀 Follow me for more AWS and data engineering content!

Top comments (0)