Introduction
Next.js offers flexibility in how applications are hosted, but without careful planning, the costs of said hosting can spiral out of control. This is why understanding the trade-off between different options is crucial to ensure you aren’t breaking budget on something you don’t need. To help tech professionals like you decide on the best solution, we’ve decided to analyze what amounts to your total bill.
To achieve that, we compared different strategies and hosting providers for your Next.js app and offered actionable ways to reduce expenses based on our experiences. If you’re looking to optimize your hosting setup, and avoid unpleasant billing surprises, read on.
For those who prefer watching to reading, we have a recording of our live session on this topic prepared as well!
The Challenges in Next.js App Hosting
Hosting Next.js apps is not as simple as some might think. The costs can escalate quickly, especially for high-traffic Next.js applications, and while there are plenty of options tailored towards companies and traffic of any size, some problems remain.
Vercel remains the go-to platform for Next.js hosting, offering built-in optimizations but making a departure from such platforms more difficult. Setting up CI/CD pipelines, configuring servers, and ensuring reliability often take significant time and expertise. At the same time, while these platforms simplify deployment, their pricing model can become prohibitively expensive as your application scales.
Finding the right trade-off between performance, scalability, and cost requires a detailed understanding of your hosting needs and the app’s architecture. To gain it, let’s look at the options for Next.js hosting.
If you want to learn more about the cost-effective strategies for hosting Next.js apps, sign up for our Next.js Hosting Cost Optimization Expert Sessions.
Hosting Options for Next.js
The choice of hosting depends on project scale, operational requirements, and available expertise. There are three solutions you can choose from:
Platform-as-a-Service (PaaS)
Platforms like Vercel, Netlify, and Heroku simplify deployment by providing built-in CI/CD pipelines, global edge networks, analytics tools, and auto-scaling optimized for frameworks like Next.js. While it’s a convenient solution, costs can quickly escalate as traffic grows due to function execution, data transfer, and pricing structures like seat-based billing.
Source: Vercel Pricing Model
Pros:
No need for extensive DevOps knowledge – all you have to do is connect a repository, configure environment variables, and deploy.
Pre-configured for Next.js, React, and other modern frameworks with built-in performance enhancements.
Global Edge network ensures low latency and fast load times with automatic CDN integration.
Automates deployments, preview environments, and rollbacks without extra configuration.
Provides real-time monitoring, performance insights, and debugging tools.
Cons:
PaaS costs rise with traffic due to function executions, data transfer, and edge requests.
Configuration options are restricted, limiting control over performance and infrastructure.
Platform-specific optimizations (e.g., Vercel’s ISR handling) can make migration difficult.
Even with low traffic in PaaS, baseline costs like seat fees apply.
Non-enterprise users can face slow response times and limited assistance.
Best Use Cases:
Small to medium projects, enterprises in the first phases, and startups.
You don’t want to spend thousands of dollars on setting up infrastructure.
Cloud Hosting (AWS, Azure, GCP)
Cloud platforms provide flexibility and scalability for Next.js apps through a variety of hosting models. These include serverless (Lambda, Cloud Functions) and containerized solutions (ECS, Kubernetes, App Engine). It’s more cost-efficient at scale compared to other solutions but requires deep DevOps expertise to configure infrastructure correctly.
Source: AWS Pricing Model
Pros:
Supports both serverless functions for cost efficiency and containerization for full control over infrastructure.
Allows custom configurations, resource allocation, and integration with any technology stack.
Adjusts resources based on traffic demands, optimizing cost and performance.
Offers a wide range of services (e.g., S3, CloudFront, Lambda).
Enables deployment across multiple regions or edge locations for low-latency access worldwide.
Cons:
Requires configuring multiple services, networking, and security policies.
Infrastructure complexity often makes teams reliant on specialized DevOps engineers.
Inefficient configurations can lead to unexpectedly high data transfer, compute, and storage costs.
Demands in-depth knowledge of cloud ecosystems, pricing models, and best practices to avoid misconfigurations.
Maintaining security, compliance, and system updates requires ongoing effort and dedicated resources.
Best Use Cases:
Medium-to-large-scale applications.
Project requiring full control over infrastructure.
Companies already using cloud ecosystems (e.g., AWS services like S3, CloudFront, and RDS).
Teams with considerable DevOps expertise and experience.
Self-Hosting (VPS, Dedicated Servers)
Teams with server management expertise can self-host on virtual private servers (VPS) like DigitalOcean, Linode (acquired by Akamai), or Hetzner. These provide total control and predictable hosting costs at the price of manual configuration and ongoing maintenance.
Source: Linode’s Cloud Pricing Calculator
Pros:
Full autonomy over server configurations, resource allocation, security policies, and performance optimizations.
Self-hosting offers stable monthly expenses without unexpected charges for function execution or data transfer
You are not tied to a specific hosting provider’s infrastructure, proprietary features, or pricing changes.
Cons:
You have to handle everything from security updates and backups to infrastructure monitoring.
Scaling requires manual upgrades to server resources, often limited to vertical scaling.
Setting up a self-hosted Next.js application involves configuring servers, deployment pipelines, and networking from scratch which takes a lot of time.
To run a self-hosted setup you need knowledge of server management, security, networking, and DevOps.
Best Use Cases:
Teams with server management expertise.
Applications that need fixed, predictable pricing.
Small-to-medium projects where performance and control over resources are priorities.
Projects that require full control over every aspect.
“Think of the three hosting options like different types of cars. PaaS is like a Tesla with autopilot—you pay for convenience, and everything is automated, so you can focus on reaching your destination. Cloud hosting is like a high-performance sports car—powerful and customizable, but it requires an experienced driver. Self-hosting, on the other hand, is like a classic car—it might be cheaper upfront, but you need to know how to maintain it, and sometimes, you’ll need a mechanic.”
Chris Lojniewski, CEO at Pagepro
What Drives Hosting Costs?
The total cost of hosting a Next.js app is influenced by multiple factors, ranging from traffic levels to ongoing maintenance. These costs can be categorized into two groups: direct and indirect.
Direct costs are charges explicitly billed by your hosting provider, typically based on resource usage such as compute time, data transfer, and storage. These are easy to track because they appear itemized on your invoice. Indirect costs don’t appear directly on your invoice but contribute to long-term operational costs.
Direct Cost Factors |
Indirect Cost Factors |
Traffic Volume |
Setup and Maintenance |
Data Transfer |
Security |
Application Complexity |
Developer Experience |
Edge & Caching Strategies |
Cost-Saving Strategies for Next.js Hosting
Hosting costs can quickly escalate if not managed properly. Optimizing content delivery, reducing unnecessary compute resources, and exploring alternative hosting solutions, can help your Next.js applications run more efficiently without breaking the budget.
Static Site Generation (SSG) and Incremental Static Regeneration (ISR)
If a page doesn’t change often, serving it as a static file is the most cost-efficient option. Pre-rendering pages reduces the need for server-side computation, which cut down on function execution costs. SSG generates static pages at build time, making them instantly available to users. For dynamic data that only needs occasional updates, ISR ensures fresh content without continuously invoking server-side rendering.
Tip: Pages with heavy content but low update frequency should use ISR instead of SSR to reduce unnecessary serverless function calls.
Streamlining CI/CD Pipelines
Frequently deploying Next.js apps can trigger unnecessary builds and increase hosting costs. A well-optimized CI/CD pipeline can reduce redundant deployments and keep resource usage under control. Using selective builds allows only the modified parts of an application to be rebuilt, instead of deploying the entire project each time. CI/CD tools like GitHub Actions, CircleCI, and Jenkins can automate workflows and cache dependencies to prevent repeated computation.
Tip: Set up caching mechanisms in CI/CD to speed up builds and reduce deployment time.
Lowering Data Transfer with Efficient Asset Delivery
Large assets increase bandwidth costs, especially when hosting platforms charge based on data transfer. Luckily, optimizing static files and media delivery can cut these expenses. Modern image formats like WebP and AVIF reduce file sizes without affecting their quality. Using lazy loading only loads images and videos when they’re needed, instead of all at once. Content Delivery Networks (CDN) such as Cloudflare, AWS CloudFront, or Fastly serve assets closer to users, reducing both bandwidth and response time.
Tip: If data transfer is a major cost factor for you, shifting static assets to a CDN can prevent unnecessary fees.
Minimizing Serverless Function Execution
Serverless functions are a convenient but costly way to handle backend logic. Overuse of API routes or middleware can lead to excessive function invocations and that increases your bill.
Caching API responses can help applications prevent repeated executions of the same logic. Consider scoping middleware to specific routes instead of running on every request. When real-time updates aren’t necessary, delegate computations to background jobs or schedule revalidation to limit unnecessary function execution.
Tip: Avoid using Server Side Rendering (SSR) for frequently visited pages that don’t need real-time updates. Use ISR or static exports instead.
Explore Alternative Hosting Options
When a Vercel bill surpasses $500/month, it’s worth evaluating whether AWS or self-hosting can offer long-term savings. While switching platforms requires an initial investment, it can result in big reductions in ongoing costs.
AWS with OpenNext is very flexible and can be more cost-effective at scale. Self-hosting on a VPS (e.g., DigitalOcean, Linode) offers fixed monthly pricing but does need DevOps expertise for maintenance. Google Cloud and Azure provide managed serverless solutions with competitive pricing models
Tip: If switching isn’t feasible, reach out to your provider for enterprise pricing or custom plans that can fit your workload.
Estimating Costs with the TCO Calculator
If you find estimating your hosting costs difficult, don’t worry. Our Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) calculator helps estimate and compare Next.js hosting costs between Vercel and AWS, considering factors like function executions, data transfer, and platform fees.
To use the calculator, start by entering key parameters. Define how many users need access to the hosting platform, the estimated visits per month, and the cache hit ratio. These factors determine how often serverless functions are triggered and how much data is transferred. Specify the average page size, including HTML, CSS, JavaScript, and assets, along with the number of API calls per visit. Function execution time is another important factor, as longer runtimes increase hosting costs, but if you’re considering AWS, including a DevOps hourly rate will provide a more realistic cost estimate.
Once the data is entered, the calculator provides a side-by-side cost breakdown for Vercel vs. AWS. Vercel’s pricing is influenced by factors like seat costs, function invocations, middleware executions, and data transfer fees. AWS, meanwhile, calculates costs based on CloudFront requests, Lambda execution times, S3 storage, and database operations.
Use the results to evaluate your hosting expenses. If Vercel’s costs are significantly higher, AWS might be a better option—provided you have the necessary DevOps resources. Remember that AWS typically requires a higher initial setup investment but offers lower long-term costs.
Adjusting cache hit ratios and optimizing function execution times can reveal potential savings during initial estimations. Reducing function calls and improving static content delivery also help control costs. Feel free to experiment with different parameters to find the most cost-effective hosting strategy for your Next.js application.
How We Lowered Hosting Costs in Previous Projects
We’ve worked on a project that involved a high-traffic application that relied heavily on server-side rendering (SSR) and API routes, leading to significant expenses on Vercel. The challenge was to maintain performance while maintaining acceptable infrastructure costs. To lower the hosting spending we took the app through a series of targeted optimizations.
Offloading Dynamic Workloads to Edge Functions
Originally, many requests were handled via API routes in Next.js, triggering costly serverless function executions. By shifting authentication, redirections, and personalization logic to edge functions, the team was able to process requests closer to the user. This move reduced latency while cutting function execution costs.
Since edge functions run on globally distributed infrastructure, they handle dynamic content efficiently without the overhead of full SSR. For example, instead of fetching user-specific data on every page load via an API, the team used middleware at the edge to personalize content before serving static pages.
Centralizing Performance Monitoring
One major cost driver was unoptimized serverless function execution times increasing compute durations and bills. The team implemented centralized monitoring to track which API routes and SSR functions were consuming the most resources.
Using tools like Vercel Analytics, AWS CloudWatch, and Prometheus, they identified inefficient queries, redundant API calls, and slow database transactions. Some API requests were fetching data that had already been cached elsewhere, adding unnecessary execution time. Optimizing how data was retrieved and reducing function execution times cut a significant portion of serverless costs.
Source: Vercel Analytics
Migrating Non-Essential Workloads to Cost-Effective Cloud Solutions
Not all workloads needed to be handled on Vercel’s serverless infrastructure. Analyzing traffic patterns helped our team find that certain background processes, scheduled jobs, and batch tasks could be offloaded to more cost-effective cloud solutions. They moved:
Background data processing to AWS Lambda with an S3 event trigger, which only ran when necessary rather than on every request.
File storage and media assets from Vercel’s edge storage to an S3 bucket, reducing expensive data transfer costs.
Periodic database updates to a scheduled job in AWS Fargate, avoiding unnecessary API calls on every request.
Migrating these workloads, allowed the application to continue running smoothly and our client to avoid Vercel’s unpredictable billing structure.
Conclusion
Optimizing Next.js hosting costs is about choosing between convenience, control, and scalability. PaaS solutions like Vercel offer smooth deployment but can become expensive at scale. AWS and other cloud providers promise flexibility but require DevOps expertise. Self-hosting offers cost predictability but demands ongoing maintenance.
The best choice for hosting your app depends on your team’s level of expertise, the application’s complexity, and the size of your budget. For our clients, we usually recommend PaaS hosting, especially Vercel, as it allows for fast app deployment with minimal DevOps experience to make future scaling easier.
When costs exceed expectations, don’t be afraid to look at alternative providers or adjust infrastructure strategies can lead to long-term savings. Remember to use the TCO calculator to compare costs and determine the most cost-effective approach for your Next.js app.
Top comments (0)