Git Flow vs Github Flow
The main differences between the git flow and the github flow are:
Git flow is a branching strategy that involves multiple branches for different purposes, such as master, develop, feature, release, and hotfix. Github flow is a simpler workflow that only uses one main branch (master) and feature branches.
Git flow is suitable for projects that have a traditional release cycle, where releases are done periodically and require a lot of quality control. Github flow is ideal for projects that have continuous deployment, where changes are deployed to production as soon as they are ready.
Git flow requires more commands and steps to manage the branches and merge them back to the main branch. Github flow relies on pull requests and code reviews to ensure the code quality and mergeability.
Git flow has a clear separation between the stable code and the development code, which can help avoid conflicts and bugs. Github flow has a faster feedback loop and allows for more collaboration and innovation.
References
- Pro Git book
- A guide to improve the Git(Hub) flow and commits messages
- Git Flow vs GitHub Flow | Alex Hyett
- What are the pros and cons of git-flow vs github-flow?
- Choosing the Right Git Workflow for Your Project: GitFlow, GitHub Flow
- Workflows Comparison: Git Flow Vs GitHub Flow - Fresh Consulting
- Git(Hub) Flow, Trunk Based Development, and Code reviews
- Learn Git Branching
- Git Flow: A successful Git branching model
- Git Flow vs Github Flow
Top comments (0)