Infrastructure as Code (IaC) is at the heart of modern platform engineering, enabling teams to define, provision, and manage infrastructure in a repeatable and scalable way. When building an Internal Developer Platform (IDP)—a self-service system that abstracts infrastructure complexities for developers—choosing the right IaC tool can make or break your platform's success.
So, should you use Terraform, Pulumi, or Crossplane to power your IDP? Let's break it down. 🕵️♂️
🏆 The Contenders: Terraform, Pulumi, and Crossplane
1️⃣ Terraform: The Industry Standard for IaC
Terraform, by HashiCorp, is the granddaddy of declarative IaC. It uses HCL (HashiCorp Configuration Language) and is loved for its mature ecosystem, large provider support, and battle-tested reliability.
Pros:
- Huge community support and ecosystem 🌎
- Mature, stable, and widely adopted ✅
- State management with Terraform Cloud & backend options
- Supports a vast number of providers (AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, etc.)
- Well-suited for infrastructure teams managing shared resources
Cons:
- Declarative-only—not great for complex logic 🔄
- State management overhead can be a pain
- Writing HCL can feel restrictive for developers used to imperative programming
2️⃣ Pulumi: IaC for Devs Who Love Code
Pulumi takes a code-first approach to IaC, allowing you to use programming languages like TypeScript, Python, Go, and C# instead of a declarative language.
Pros:
- Leverages real programming languages for infrastructure 💻
- Easier for developers to adopt (especially in an IDP setting)
- No state file management (defaults to backend storage like AWS S3)
- Great support for Kubernetes and cloud-native workloads
Cons:
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Terraform
- Less mature than Terraform, with a smaller community
- Requires learning a new API even in familiar languages
3️⃣ Crossplane: The Kubernetes-Native IaC Solution
Crossplane is a cloud-native control plane that extends Kubernetes to manage infrastructure using Kubernetes Custom Resource Definitions (CRDs). It brings GitOps-style infrastructure management to the table.
Pros:
- Full Kubernetes integration—your infra is managed like any other K8s resource 📦
- Eliminates the need for external state management
- Policy-driven infrastructure provisioning 🛡️
- Multi-cloud support with a single API surface
Cons:
- Requires deep Kubernetes knowledge—not ideal for non-K8s users 🚧
- Smaller ecosystem compared to Terraform
- Can be overkill if your IDP doesn’t revolve around Kubernetes
🔥 Terraform vs. Pulumi vs. Crossplane: Which One Wins for IDPs? 🏁
🚀 Developer Experience (DX)
- Pulumi wins for developers who want a familiar coding experience.
- Terraform is okay, but HCL can feel clunky.
- Crossplane is K8s-centric, which may or may not fit your developers' needs.
⚙️ Integration with Kubernetes
- Crossplane dominates here—it’s built around Kubernetes.
- Terraform and Pulumi can integrate with Kubernetes but require extra work.
📦 Multi-Cloud & Multi-Provider Support
- Terraform has the most providers (AWS, GCP, Azure, Kubernetes, etc.).
- Pulumi supports many of the same providers but has a smaller ecosystem.
- Crossplane is great for cloud-native multi-cloud but lacks the breadth of Terraform.
🔄 State Management & GitOps
- Crossplane handles state natively with Kubernetes (no need for an external state store!).
- Pulumi has backend storage options and doesn’t require state management.
- Terraform requires state management (Terraform Cloud, S3, Consul, etc.).
🏗️ Best Fit for Internal Developer Platforms
| Feature | Terraform | Pulumi | Crossplane |
|---|---|---|---|
| Best for Ops Teams | ✅ | ❌ | ❌ |
| Best for Dev Teams | ❌ | ✅ | ❌ |
| Best for K8s Users | ❌ | ✅ | ✅ |
| Maturity & Stability | ✅ | 🔸 | 🔸 |
| GitOps Friendly | 🔸 | 🔸 | ✅ |
- Use Terraform if: You need a stable, widely adopted solution for traditional infra provisioning.
- Use Pulumi if: You want an IDP that feels more natural for developers and supports multi-cloud.
- Use Crossplane if: Your IDP is deeply Kubernetes-native and you want full GitOps integration.
🎯 Final Verdict: Choose Based on Your IDP Needs
There’s no one-size-fits-all solution. The right tool depends on how your IDP is structured and who will be managing infrastructure:
- For Ops-driven teams → Terraform
- For Developer-friendly experience → Pulumi
- For Kubernetes-native GitOps setups → Crossplane
If you’re building an IDP, consider mixing Terraform for infrastructure provisioning and Crossplane for Kubernetes resource management. Or, if your developers love coding, Pulumi can bridge the gap between infra and app dev teams.
🚀 Next Steps
✅ Try out each tool in a proof-of-concept for your IDP.
✅ Consider hybrid approaches—many teams use Terraform + Crossplane or Pulumi + Terraform.
✅ Embrace automation and GitOps to make infra changes seamless.
Which tool are you using for your IDP? Let me know in the comments! 🛠️💬
Top comments (0)