Hi all I just wanted to know the different linux distros you are using for development and why you chose that.
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Read next
“Bitcoin and Open Source: How Cryptocurrency Changed the Development Ecosystem”
Andy Larkin -
Why I Can't Stop Talking About Arc Browser: A Developer's Story
Muzaffar Hossain -
How to Create Native .NET Applications for ARM Processors: A Practical Guide for Developers
ByteHide -
Mat menu angular 7
Chakir Ayoub -
Top comments (117)
You forgot:
I've been using Arch Linux for a while but I ended up switching for something more "stable", rolling release is awesome but it can break to easy, I don't want that on a machine I use to code.
Broken packages is extremely rare.
The malware stuff was removed under an hour. Shit happens, what's important is how they deal with it. Also if you don't read the install files of an AUR package you're gonna have a bad time!
And no, arch doesn't break. I've used it for 10 years now and it broke less than Ubuntu that I was using before (why do you think I switched :p)
Well I did use Arch for years and while it's true that I doesn't break THAT often, it still can happen (and it happened to me a few times). I'm not saying it's a bad distro, it's awesome, but if you want guaranteed stability (without taking time to double check things when you update), rolling release (on Arch or otherwise) is not the best idea.
Also, don't take my first post too seriously, it was a bit satirical :)
If you find Arch too much "cutting edge", maybe you could give Manjaro a try ! You get Arch benefits but packages updates are much more tested, so less risks(:
I'm surprised nobody has mentioned antergos.com. Arch-based, installer is very nice, can support live CD mode.
RIP antergos =,(
I’ve been using arch for about six years and I can only remember one broken package which was fixed in a couple of hours. In the meantime I had simply downgraded that package.
Arch has been very stable for me. I have a ~5 year old notebook still running its first arch installation. And it has seen many different desktop environments and a lot of AUR packages.
For me arch is the perfect dev distro.
Manjaro Deepin:
forum.manjaro.org/t/manjaro-deepin...
Manjaro Deepin is beautiful but I use KDE because of my computer
Linux Mint, the ubuntu we deserve
Has a slick look. Is it maintained by Manjaro Team or another team?
I think that it has some support from Manjaro team, but as this is community edition most of the support comes from the team that assembled it.
Depends on the technology stack.
This is a good set up. You have clear separation of concerns when it comes to the kind of development you are doing. But curious though why Ubuntu for docker you could've gone with a much lighter alternative.
Right. Well, in general I prefer DEB over RPM, which leaves me with Ubuntu and Debian as officially supported docker (host) distributions. I guess the most important factor that made me decide in favour of Ubuntu is that my 1st docker project included 3rd party docker images based on Ubuntu (Ubuntu being the container OS). My backup plan was: with Ubuntu inside the container AND outside the container no matter how bad a problem with docker might get, I could always escape dockerization.
Later of course I used smaller distributions in the containers. But I'm still pretty happy with Ubuntu being the docker host system, so I've never switched.
"Pop!_os"
I purchased a laptop from a company which also happens to be the makers of Pop!_os. Their laptops come with your choice of either Ubuntu or Pop!_os installed. I'd already tried Ubuntu before and Pop!_os is a derivative of Ubuntu, so I took it as an opportunity to try something new. I ended up really liking it. It's very straightforward to use, my existing knowledge transfers well, and almost all of the screen real-estate is used for programs.
This is an OS I have not heard of. It seems interesting but with all those animations doesn't it become resource hungry?
I don't know of any major animation involved with Pop!_os. Just bare-basic animations to prevent transitions from being jarring -- the same kinds I see on my Android phone. I've never noticed major resource use by this laptop unless I'm doing something strange like running multiple web servers, though it is a beefy laptop to begin with. On a normal day, the only processes which consume a meaningful amount of resources are Tracker and Firefox.
It's good then. I am gonna give this a try. :)
I'm also a System 76 user, although I haven't tried out Pop. Other than just hating the name, my Ubuntu setup "just works", and I'd rather spend my time working than experimenting with OS flavors.
I do agree that it's a weird name. The main reason that I tried it was that I was expecting to need to install a new OS on it anyway and may as well try a new one before doing that.
I'm using KDE neon.
Try CentOS in production trust me you will feel a difference in things and save you loads as it takes less resources to get the job done and also does it more efficiently than Ubuntu.
I'm using KDE Neon for the same motives, it is just ubuntu with the last kde plasma.
I'm currently using Manjaro with i3 as a development machine at home because everything except the browser is done in a terminal emulator anyway. I have Debian on my personal servers and CentOS at work. I don't much like CentOS as a user system but it's ok on a server.
I run Debian and CentOS locally for Vagrant and Docker respectively.
That out the way, the reason I like Manjaro? I wanted to try Arch and have been happy enough with it not to want to hop distros. I used to use Debian unstable, and that worked for years without a hitch, but this is more up-to-the-minute and the AUR is really very good for finding anything I want.
Really, unless you're using something specific to that distro like a custom DE or want to run something non-free where the providers thing that the only distro in existence is Ubuntu, then there's not much difference. Stuff usually works and it's rarely more than a quick search away to find a solution to most problems.
Manjaro I heard is quite unstable and the team's support is often slow and sometimes the issues go overlooked is it true?
I've been using it a few months and not seen any problems so far, but I don't really do anything that exciting with it, so...
Will give this a try this is also topping the distrowatch's list nowadays.
Debian.
Stable for most servers, testing for my workstation.
I know a lot of people seem to like Ubuntu, but they still have yet to convince me they can really think like a server distro [whereas I've friends who've been bitten by how they don't]
Am planning to delve into Devuan now that they've had a couple of releases...
I have used Debian and CentOS for servers. Some how I feel CentOS is better than Debian when it comes to servers. CentOS tries to emulate some of RedHat capabilities too. You can give it a try and you are right about Ubuntu definitely not a choice for running in servers so much bloatware.
For enterprisey stuff, I might consider RHEL or SLES, but I find generally they ship versions if things too out of date for my needs.
CentOS doesn't merely emulate RHEL, it is RHEL. Basically, they rebuild the packages, with all the branding changed, and the restricted features taken out. Even before they were taken over by RedHat. Check Section 9 of the CentOS 7 release notes: wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNot...
When I was building SANs, I used SLES, but mostly because of SuSE Studio.
I am yet to try Arch Linux. I have been a hearing a lot of buzz about how cool it is. But for me as developer more than tools stability matters and I was introduced to Arch when it was unstable like broken releases bugs arising frequently. But since a lot of you are saying it's quite stable I am going to give it a try. :)
If you are still interested, seeing that I am almost one year too late, try ArcoLinux. It has 3 "flavors" so to speak. The base is plug and play and have fun, just like antergos. The second is bare bones, almost like Vanilla Arch with some facilitated installation. The third is "build yourself". You define what you want in your OS and build the ISO.
It is a hands-on learning distro that also provides a functional lightweight environment with a good tutorial for working with each flavor
Try to use Manjaro bro. It's very awesome.
That's also in my list since many people here are saying it's cool.
elementary OS 5.0 Juno (currently in beta).
I love the design and it's stable enough for me.
Running 04.01 on my dev workstation with three monitors, but running the Juno beta on my laptop. Love the clean simple interface. Elementary OS has never failed me. It's super stable!
But what about the package support for Elementary OS. I heard it isn't that great.
I think you heard wrong.
The OS seems lightweight gonna give it a try and see how it fares for my personal project needs.
It's very lightweight with rock solid stability. I thoroughly enjoyed doing dev work on elementaryOS Loki. I had to move to a MacBook Pro for work, so I don't use it as much any more, but I would go back to it in a heartbeat.
Elementary is based off Ubuntu, so it supports all the same PPA's and .debs that ubuntu can use
Lubuntu
The UI might not look great. But one of the advantages compared to other debian based distros is it doesn't take much space or resources.
I'm using 17.10 but it still uses 250MB RAM and 2% processes after starting up
Wow that's nice 250MB RAM gives a lot more memory for programs. This definitely wronged my notion that Ubuntu is slower compared to other distros.
Many won't like it because of the UI, it may look like windows 95. But it gets the job done
At the end of the day looks doesn't matter as long as it can get the work done in a faster and better way.