TypeScript has established itself as the go-to tool for building scalable, maintainable, and efficient applications. Its type system is not only ro...
For further actions, you may consider blocking this person and/or reporting abuse
Awesome topic! It’s always exciting to dive deeper into TypeScript and explore advanced techniques. I’m curious, does the article cover practical use cases for things like conditional types or template literal types? These can be game-changers when applied creatively. Looking forward to reading and leveling up my TypeScript skills!
thanks for sharing a great article.
Thanks for taking the time to read it!🖤
Great! Thanks!
Thanks for reading and appreciating the effort😊
Thanks for sharing
No problem at all. Hope it adds value!😊😊
Great series!
You're welcome! Glad you found it useful.😊🖤
github.com/ts-essentials/ts-essent...
Great article
Thanks for the kind words🖤
Amazing!
Thanks for checking it out😊🖤
Great Read, thanks for sharing
Thanks! Sharing is caring, after all 😄
Good!
Thanks, appreciate the kind words!🖤
Very creative and useful article. Thanks bro....
I'm glad it was useful to you. That's what I aimed for!!🖤
Nice article!! I have a question. I'm still figuring out the usefullness of Type Guards, which in principle seems fine, but in practice it seems awkward. The "typeof" operator have been out in the field in many languages and the examples I have seen both in your article and in the TypeScript documentation doesn't explain the need for that Type Guard.
For example: the isString function if the type guard ensures the value is string then why not just return true? At the same time it defeats the purpose to have a function that always returns true. And what would be the behaviour if I call the function with a number?
Just for the sake of understanding I created a test which worked the same with the type guard and without it, so, I can't spot the value of having such syntax.
It's a great question, Juan! Type Guards like
isString
aren't just about returningtrue
orfalse
they narrow down the type of a variable, enabling TypeScript to provide better type-checking and autocomplete support.For example, in your
isString
test:Without the guard, TypeScript wouldn't know
value
is a string, andtoUpperCase()
would throw an error for non-strings.This mechanism shines when working with
unknown
orany
types, union types (string | number
), or complex objects. Guards ensure safety while avoiding redundant casting.Your tests likely work because you're manually ensuring the values match expected types. In dynamic code, where inputs aren't predictable, Type Guards save the day. They're less about "returning true" and more about refining types to avoid runtime errors.
Let me know if you have any other questions...😊
Looking for some TypeScript posts.
Thanks for sharing this.
thank you for sharing this beautyful text
Great Steps
Thank you for your kind words! It means a lot...