DEV Community

Anuj Tyagi
Anuj Tyagi

Posted on • Edited on

Comparing AWS RDS and Amazon Aurora: Which Managed Database Service is Right for You?

When we have select between Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS (Relational Database Service), it is important to know the different features and benefits that each provide for your relational database needs on AWS. While both are aimed at streamlining the database operations, they are meant for different operational scenarios and at different scales. Here’s a detailed comparison to help you decide which is best for your database needs.

Amazon RDS: Overview

Amazon RDS is a managed relational database service that enables you to create, configure, and scale a relational database for use in your applications. It takes care of the cost-efficient, resizable capacity (pay only for the resources you consume) and does alleviate from time-consuming administration tasks including hardware provisioning, setting up the database, performing patching and backups.

Image description

Supported Database Engines

  • PostgreSQL

  • MySQL

  • MariaDB

  • Oracle

  • SQL Server

  • Amazon Aurora

Key Features of RDS

Simplicity: The control plane for common maintenance tasks of high-volume databases is automated on RDS, allowing you to spend more time on optimizing your applications instead of management features.

Scalability: Facilitates scaling of compute and storage as necessary, with little downtime and automatic scaling for your workloads.

High Availability and Disaster Recovery: Offers Multi-AZ deployments for increased availability and reliability for production databases, providing automatic failover to secondary instances in the event of a failure.

Security: Has built-in capabilities for encryption both in transit and at rest and integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM).

Amazon Aurora: Detailed Overview

Amazon Aurora is a relational database service, built by AWS that is compatible with PostgreSQL and MySQL. All of this makes it faster, more reliable, more durable, and more scalable than traditional relational databases.

Key Features of Aurora

Better Performance: Provides up to 5 times the throughput of standard MySQL and 3 times the throughput of standard PostgreSQL in aggregate transactions, without requiring modification of most of your existing applications.

Enhanced Durability and Availability: Six copies of your data replicated across three Availability Zones and continuously backed up to Amazon S3 with availability exceeding 99.99%.

Scalability: Aurora support to 64TB database size and 15 read replicas with low-latency read performance.

Cost-Effectiveness: Aurora being serverless, you pay-for-what-you-use. It means costs for I/O, storage, and instance hours, can leave it cheap for high-demand

Image description

How to Choose Between Aurora and RDS

1. Performance Requirements

Aurora: Those application need superior performance database management with more throughput and scalability, Aurora is the ideal choice.

RDS: Ideal for applications with moderate database workloads where traditional database engines like MySQL or PostgreSQL are sufficient.

2. Database Engine Compatibility

Aurora: Ideal for MySQL or PostgreSQL users who want added performance features of Aurora.

RDS: Best suited for those want to use Oracle or SQL server databases that Aurora does not offer.

3. Cost Implications

Aurora: It is more cost effective for larger databases as storage scales automatically with data size.

RDS: It is better for smaller databases or using premium DB engine features are required (e.g., SQL Server)

4. Administrative Overhead

Aurora and RDS both are managed services, but Aurora is more optimized to handle replication and backup task more seamlessly.

5. Specific Use Cases

Aurora: More suitable for large enterprise applications with higher traffic, for online transaction processing (OLTP) systems, and applications require higher throughput.

Image description

RDS: Best use cases for business applications. For instance, CRM systems, and other applications which require standard relational database services.

Conclusion

In the nutshell, whether to use Amazon RDS or Aurora depends on the specific requirements from the database, which include budget constraints, preferred database engines, performance requirements and operational control we want. Both services can be integrated with other AWS services. It provides a robust infrastructure to deploy, manage, and scale database application. We can evaluate both database in the context of operational objectives to make an informed decision that aligns with your strategic goals.

Amazon Aurora and Amazon RDS are both powerful tools for managing relational databases, and understanding their differences will help you unlock the full potential of your AWS environment. Whether you prioritize scalability, cost-effectiveness, or specific engine compatibility, AWS has a solution tailored to your needs.

Top comments (0)