Who are New Relic and Datadog?
The monitoring landscape has transformed dramatically, with Datadog and New Relic emerging as leading solutions. Each platform brings its unique approach to observability and monitoring challenges.
Datadog, founded in 2010, built its foundation on infrastructure monitoring. They've since evolved into a comprehensive observability platform, maintaining their infrastructure-first approach. This heritage makes them particularly strong in complex cloud environments and distributed systems, where deep infrastructure insight is crucial.
New Relic, established in 2008, pioneered modern APM solutions. Their initial focus on application performance shaped their development into a platform that excels in providing deep application insights. While they've expanded to full-stack observability, their application-centric approach continues to define their solution design and user experience.
Application Performance Monitoring (APM)
Datadog's APM Solution
Datadog's APM reflects their infrastructure-first heritage, offering deep integration with their broader monitoring ecosystem.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Continuous code profiling with granular insights • Custom sampling rules for specific services • Detailed service dependency mapping • Real-time performance analytics • Advanced metric correlation |
| Strengths | • Extensive customization options • Deep infrastructure integration • Powerful visualization tools • Comprehensive trace search • Rich analytics capabilities |
| Limitations | • Steeper learning curve • Complex initial setup • Higher configuration overhead • More expensive at scale • Requires technical expertise |
New Relic's APM Solution
New Relic's APM emphasizes simplicity and rapid deployment, reflecting their focus on developer experience.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Automatic instrumentation • Code-level performance insights • Distributed tracing capabilities • Error tracking and analytics • Deployment markers |
| Strengths | • Quick implementation • User-friendly interface • Strong default settings • Faster time to value • Excellent APM basics |
| Limitations | • Less customization flexibility • Basic sampling options • More rigid workflows • Simpler visualizations • Fewer advanced features |
APM Comparison Verdict
When choosing between Datadog and New Relic for APM, your decision should be based on your specific requirements and organizational context.
Choose Datadog APM if you need extensive customization, have a complex infrastructure, or require deep performance insights. Its powerful features and flexibility make it ideal for large enterprises with dedicated DevOps teams and sophisticated monitoring needs.
Choose New Relic APM if you value quick implementation, easy team adoption, and straightforward monitoring. It's particularly well-suited for small to medium-sized businesses, teams new to APM, or organizations that need rapid deployment with minimal configuration.
Log Management
Datadog Logging
Datadog's log management solution provides extensive customization and advanced analysis capabilities, consistent with their infrastructure-focused approach.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Multi-source log ingestion • Custom parsing rules • Machine learning pattern detection • Live tail and streaming • Advanced search syntax |
| Strengths | • Flexible retention policies • Rich visualization options • Deep infrastructure correlation • Advanced filtering capabilities • Custom processors |
| Limitations | • Complex query language • Higher storage costs • Setup complexity • Resource-intensive • Steep learning curve |
New Relic Logging
New Relic's log management focuses on simplicity and integration with their unified platform approach.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Automatic log parsing • Built-in pattern detection • Basic search functionality • Standard retention options • APM correlation |
| Strengths | • Easy implementation • Quick setup process • Good APM integration • Standard visualization • Straightforward queries |
| Limitations | • Limited custom parsing • Basic retention options • Fixed indexing rules • Simple search syntax • Fewer analysis tools |
Log Management Verdict
When evaluating log management solutions between these platforms, the decision largely depends on your log analysis complexity and operational maturity.
Datadog emerges as the top choice for enterprises dealing with massive log volumes and intricate analysis requirements. Its standout features include machine learning-driven pattern recognition, sophisticated parsing capabilities, and highly flexible data retention strategies. This makes it especially valuable for organizations running microservices architectures, handling sensitive compliance requirements, or needing to perform complex log correlation across distributed systems.
New Relic's approach to log management focuses on accessibility and direct APM integration. This platform shines in scenarios where teams need to quickly correlate application issues with log events, without getting bogged down in complex configurations. It's particularly effective for development teams who prioritize rapid troubleshooting and want to maintain a clear connection between application performance and log data. The platform's straightforward query language and out-of-the-box parsing rules significantly reduce the initial setup time, though at the cost of some advanced capabilities.
For organizations just starting with centralized logging or those with straightforward monitoring needs, New Relic's streamlined approach offers a more practical path forward. However, companies with sophisticated logging requirements, especially those in regulated industries or with complex debugging needs, will find Datadog's robust feature set more aligned with their objectives.
Infrastructure Monitoring
Datadog Infrastructure
Datadog's infrastructure monitoring represents their core strength, offering comprehensive visibility and control.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Auto-discovery and mapping • Container orchestration • Cloud provider integration • Custom metric collection • Real-time monitoring |
| Strengths | • Deep visibility • Extensive integrations • Advanced analytics • Customizable dashboards • Rich metadata support |
| Limitations | • Premium pricing • Complex configuration • Resource overhead • Setup expertise needed • Feature overwhelm |
New Relic Infrastructure
New Relic's infrastructure monitoring provides essential visibility with an emphasis on simplicity.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Basic infrastructure metrics • Cloud service monitoring • Container basics • Standard alerting • Host monitoring |
| Strengths | • Quick setup • Easy integration • Clear interface • Basic customization • Good defaults |
| Limitations | • Limited depth • Basic metrics only • Fewer integrations • Simple dashboards • Standard alerts |
Infrastructure Monitoring Verdict
Infrastructure monitoring represents a crucial battleground where the fundamental philosophies of both platforms become most apparent.
Datadog demonstrates its infrastructure-first DNA with a comprehensive suite of monitoring capabilities that go well beyond basic metrics. The platform excels at handling complex, multi-cloud environments, offering detailed insights into container orchestration, serverless functions, and hybrid infrastructures. Organizations running sophisticated cloud architectures particularly benefit from Datadog's ability to provide granular visibility into resource utilization, performance bottlenecks, and system dependencies. Its robust customization options allow teams to track specific infrastructure metrics that matter most to their business operations.
New Relic takes a more pragmatic approach, focusing on essential infrastructure monitoring that complements its APM strengths. The platform successfully bridges the gap between application and infrastructure monitoring, making it particularly valuable for development teams who need clear visibility into how infrastructure changes impact application performance. While it may not match Datadog's depth in pure infrastructure monitoring, New Relic's integrated approach often proves more practical for organizations that prioritize developer productivity over extensive infrastructure analytics.
The choice ultimately comes down to monitoring philosophy and operational needs. Companies running complex cloud architectures, using multiple providers, or requiring detailed infrastructure analytics will find Datadog's comprehensive approach invaluable. Conversely, organizations seeking a balanced view of their infrastructure within the context of application performance will appreciate New Relic's more streamlined, integrated approach to infrastructure monitoring.
Network Monitoring
Datadog Network Monitoring
Datadog offers comprehensive network visibility with detailed performance analysis capabilities.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Network flow analysis • Performance metrics • Packet capture • DNS monitoring • Network topology mapping |
| Strengths | • Deep network insights • Advanced troubleshooting • Real-time monitoring • Detailed metrics • Custom dashboards |
| Limitations | • Additional cost • Complex setup • High data volume • Performance impact • Advanced expertise needed |
New Relic Network Monitoring
New Relic provides basic network monitoring capabilities focused on application connectivity.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Basic network metrics • Connection monitoring • Simple topology view • Standard alerts • Service maps |
| Strengths | • Easy to implement • Application context • Basic troubleshooting • Low overhead • Integrated view |
| Limitations | • Limited depth • Basic metrics only • No packet analysis • Simple visualization • Minimal customization |
Network Monitoring Verdict
Network monitoring capabilities highlight significant differences in monitoring depth between the platforms.
Datadog provides enterprise-grade network monitoring suitable for organizations requiring detailed network analysis and performance optimization. Its comprehensive feature set makes it ideal for complex network environments and detailed troubleshooting.
New Relic offers basic network visibility that satisfies simple monitoring needs. It's sufficient for organizations primarily focused on application performance who need only basic network insights.
Real-User Monitoring
Datadog RUM
Datadog's Real User Monitoring provides detailed insights into user experience and application performance.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Session replay • User journey tracking • Performance analytics • Error tracking • Custom events |
| Strengths | • Detailed user insights • Advanced analytics • Custom metrics • Rich visualizations • Deep integration |
| Limitations | • Complex configuration • Higher costs • Data volume challenges • Privacy considerations • Setup overhead |
New Relic Browser
New Relic's browser monitoring focuses on essential user experience metrics with straightforward implementation.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Key Features | • Page load timing • JavaScript errors • SPA monitoring • Basic user tracking • Frontend errors |
| Strengths | • Simple setup • Core metrics • Easy integration • Clear reporting • Quick insights |
| Limitations | • Basic features • Limited customization • Simple analysis • Standard reports • Fixed metrics |
RUM Comparison Verdict
The approach to Real User Monitoring reflects each platform's broader philosophy.
Datadog offers a comprehensive RUM solution ideal for organizations needing detailed user experience analytics and custom tracking capabilities. It's particularly valuable for companies where user experience directly impacts business outcomes.
New Relic provides a more straightforward RUM solution that covers essential user experience metrics. It's well-suited for teams wanting quick implementation and basic user experience monitoring without complex configuration.
Pricing Analysis
Datadog Pricing
Datadog employs a resource-based pricing model focusing on hosts and data volume.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Core Pricing | • Infrastructure: $15/host/month • APM: $31/host/month • Log Management: $0.10/GB • RUM: $1.50/1000 sessions • Network: $5/host/month |
| Additional Costs | • Data retention extensions • Custom metrics • Synthetic monitoring • Security monitoring • Specialized features |
| Volume Discounts | • Enterprise volume pricing • Annual commitment discounts • Multi-product bundles • Custom enterprise plans • Reserved instances |
New Relic Pricing
New Relic uses a user-based pricing model with data ingestion measurements.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Core Pricing | • Data ingestion: $0.25/GB • Full Platform User: $99/month • Core User: $49/month • Basic User: Free • 100GB free ingestion |
| Additional Costs | • Extended retention • Pro features access • Additional data • ML capabilities • Advanced features |
| Discounts Available | • Annual commitments • Volume discounts • Educational pricing • Startup programs • Non-profit rates |
Pricing Comparison Verdict
Pricing structures reflect fundamentally different approaches to monitoring and customer needs.
Datadog's resource-based pricing works best for organizations with predictable infrastructure and clear monitoring needs. While potentially more expensive, it offers precise control over monitoring costs and scales with infrastructure growth.
New Relic's user-based pricing provides more predictable costs for organizations focused on team access and collaboration. It's often more cost-effective for smaller teams but can become expensive with high data volumes.
Implementation & Integration
Deployment Process
Both platforms require careful planning and execution for successful implementation.
| Category | Details |
|---|---|
| Datadog Setup | • Agent deployment • Integration configuration • Custom dashboard creation • Alert setup • Team training |
| New Relic Setup | • Agent installation • Basic configuration • Default dashboard setup • Quick start guides • Auto-instrumentation |
Integration Capabilities
| Platform | Integration Features |
|---|---|
| Datadog | • 400+ built-in integrations • Custom integration options • API access • Webhook support • Extensive documentation |
| New Relic | • 200+ standard integrations • Basic API access • Common platforms • Simple webhooks • Integration guides |
Implementation Verdict
Implementation requirements and complexity vary significantly between platforms.
Datadog generally requires more upfront planning and technical expertise but offers greater flexibility and customization options. Organizations should be prepared for a longer implementation period and more resource investment.
New Relic provides a faster path to basic monitoring with simpler setup requirements. While this means quicker time-to-value, it may limit advanced customization options.
User Experience
Platform Overview
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Datadog Interface | • Modern dashboard design • Advanced customization • Powerful query language • Rich visualization options • Comprehensive tools |
| New Relic Interface | • Clean, intuitive design • Streamlined navigation • Simple query builder • Standard visualizations • Essential tools |
User Experience Verdict
The user experience of each platform aligns with their target users and use cases.
Datadog offers a feature-rich interface that caters to technical users who need deep customization and advanced analytics capabilities. While powerful, it requires more training and expertise to utilize effectively.
New Relic provides a more approachable interface focused on quick access to essential information. This makes it ideal for teams that need immediate insights without extensive platform knowledge.
Final Verdict
Choosing between Datadog and New Relic requires careful consideration of your organization's specific needs, resources, and monitoring goals. Here's our comprehensive recommendation based on different organizational scenarios:
Choose Datadog if your organization needs deep, customizable monitoring capabilities. It's the ideal choice for enterprises with complex infrastructure, multiple cloud environments, or specific monitoring requirements. Datadog excels in providing detailed insights across your entire stack, making it perfect for organizations that:
- Require extensive customization options
- Have complex, distributed infrastructure
- Need advanced analytics capabilities
- Have dedicated DevOps teams
- Value detailed network visibility
- Want comprehensive infrastructure monitoring
Choose New Relic if you prioritize quick implementation and straightforward monitoring solutions. It's particularly well-suited for organizations focused on application performance and teams that want rapid deployment with minimal configuration. New Relic is the better choice when you:
- Need fast implementation
- Have limited DevOps resources
- Want predictable pricing
- Focus primarily on application performance
- Prefer simplified setup and maintenance
- Value integrated basic monitoring features
Remember that both platforms continue to evolve, adding new features and capabilities. Your choice should align with your current needs while considering future growth and scalability requirements.
FAQ
Is Datadog better than New Relic? Neither is universally "better" - Datadog excels in infrastructure monitoring and customization, while New Relic offers easier implementation and better APM basics.
Which platform is more cost-effective? New Relic typically costs less for small teams and basic monitoring needs, while Datadog can be more cost-effective for large-scale infrastructure monitoring.
Can I use both platforms simultaneously? Yes, though it's generally not recommended due to increased costs and complexity. Choose the platform that best fits your primary use case.
Which has better APM capabilities? Both offer strong APM features. New Relic provides easier implementation and better out-of-box experience, while Datadog offers more customization and deeper infrastructure integration.
How long does implementation take? New Relic typically takes 2-4 days for basic setup, while Datadog usually requires 1-2 weeks for full implementation.
Do I need technical expertise? New Relic requires less technical expertise for basic setup, while Datadog needs more technical knowledge to utilize its full capabilities.
Which is better for cloud monitoring? Datadog typically offers more comprehensive cloud monitoring features, especially for complex multi-cloud environments.
What about scalability? Both platforms scale well, but Datadog typically handles large-scale deployments better, while New Relic offers more predictable scaling costs.
Additional Resources
You may also be interested in:
Top comments (0)