Discover why blindly setting CPU limits in Kubernetes leads to throttling, wasted resources, and poor application performance. Learn how prioritizing CPU requests and embracing burstable workloads can unlock cost efficiency, optimize resource utilization, and supercharge your cluster’s performance.
Why Kubernetes CPU Limits Are Harming Your Cluster
Kubernetes resource management is a balancing act. While CPU limits seem like a safe way to prevent resource hogging, they often backfire, creating throttling nightmares, underutilized nodes, and sluggish applications. Here’s why:
1. CPU Limits Cause Throttling (And Why It’s Worse Than You Think)
When a container hits its CPU limit, Kubernetes enforces throttling via Linux’s CFS (Completely Fair Scheduler) quotas. Throttling halts the process until the next scheduling window, introducing latency spikes. For example: - A pod with a 500m limit gets throttled if it uses 600ms of CPU in a 100ms window. - Repeated throttling cascades into delayed request handling, slower batch jobs, and degraded user experience.
Real-World Impact: A web app’s API response time jumps from 50ms to 500ms during traffic spikes due to throttling, even when the node has idle CPU cycles.
2. Wasted Resources = Wasted Money
Limits artificially cap CPU usage, preventing pods from borrowing idle resources. This creates: - Underutilized Nodes: If a node has 4 CPUs but pods are limited to 3 CPUs total, 25% of capacity sits unused. - Overprovisioning: Teams spin up extra nodes to compensate for “safety margins,” inflating cloud bills.
Example: A cluster with 10 nodes could likely run the same workload on 8 nodes if limits were replaced with intelligent requests.
3. Poor Performance for Burstable Workloads
Most applications aren’t steady-state. They need bursts (e.g., startup sequences, traffic spikes). Limits strangle these bursts, forcing apps to operate below their potential.
The Irony: Limits were meant to protect nodes from greedy pods, but they often punish well-behaved apps that could safely borrow unused CPU.
The Fix: Ditch Limits, Embrace CPU Requests + Burstable Workloads
CPU requests guarantee resources for a pod, while allowing it to burst when the node has spare capacity. Here’s why this works:
1. Requests Reserve Minimum CPU, Bursts Use Idle Cycles
A pod with a 1-core request is guaranteed 1 CPU but can temporarily use more if the node isn’t saturated. - Kubernetes allocates “unclaimed” CPU to pods proportionally based on their requests.
Example: Pod A (request=1) and Pod B (request=2) compete for idle CPU. Pod B gets 2/3 of the extra CPU, Pod A gets 1/3.
2. Better Utilization, Lower Costs
Nodes run closer to full capacity without overcommitting. - Fewer nodes are needed, reducing infrastructure costs by 20–40% in many cases.
3. Eliminate Throttling, Boost Performance
Without arbitrary limits, applications burst freely during peak demand. A CI/CD job finishes in 2 minutes instead of 5, or a microservice handles 10k RPM instead of 6k.
Best Practices for Efficient CPU Management
- Set Requests Based on P99 Usage: Use historical metrics to determine safe minimums.
- Avoid Limits Unless Absolutely Necessary: Only enforce limits for truly disruptive workloads (e.g., legacy monolithic apps).
- Use Vertical Pod Autoscaler (VPA): Dynamically adjust requests based on usage patterns.
-
Monitor Throttling: Use
kubectl top pods --containersor Prometheus metrics likecontainer_cpu_cfs_throttled_periods_total.
3 Key Takeaways
- CPU Limits Are Throttling Traps: They degrade performance and create artificial bottlenecks.
- Requests + Burstable Workloads = Efficiency: Let pods borrow idle CPU to maximize node utilization and slash costs.
- Monitor and Adjust Dynamically: Use tools like VPA to align resource guarantees with real-world needs.
Final Tip: Start by auditing CPU limits in your cluster. Replace them with well-calibrated requests, and watch latency drop and costs follow suit. Your applications—and your CFO—will thank you.
Top comments (0)