Introduction
In the series of posts over the last few weeks, I've been creating PAC-level examples at the register level. Obviously, a lot of low-level knowledge is required to develop at the PAC level. Additionally, the code can become really verbose. As such, adding abstractions would not only help in reducing the amount of code but also reduce the amount of required low-level knowledge.
In this post, I am going to grab existing code that I've done in the previous UART post and create an abstraction around it. This would be a step in the direction of creating a hardware abstraction layer (HAL) for a device. What will be interesting to see is that it's similar to creating component drivers I've explained in a past post. Ultimately, a proper HAL would have larger goals than creating abstractions over individual peripherals, instead, a HAL would try to encompass as many devices as possible. One way of doing that in Rust is using the embedded-hal crate which achieves that through traits. I will show how the embedded-hal can be incorporated into an abstraction crate in a later post.
If you find this post useful, and if Embedded Rust interests you, stay in the know and skyrocket your learning curve by subscribing to The Embedded Rustacean newsletter:
Subscribe Now to The Embedded Rustacean
In what follows, I will replicate the steps of the "4 Simple Steps for Creating a Platform Agnostic Driver in Rust" post. I will also add additional steps that adjust the code from the UART post to use the new abstraction.
1οΈβ£ Create a Library Binary Package that Imports the Embedded HAL π
Instead of creating a regular binary package with a main.rs
here we need a library package. I will call the library package stm32-uart-hal
. The library package can be created with cargo in the command line as follows:
$ cargo new stm32-uart-hal --lib
Next, the pac needs to be imported in the lib.rs
:
#![no_std]
use stm32f401_pac as pac;
2οΈβ£ Create the Peripheral Driver Struct π
This is the main part of the peripheral abstraction layer. We'd have to define the struct that through it, all the function implementations will be provided. This looks something like this:
pub struct Uart2Tx;
I am calling the struct Uart2Tx
referring to the USART2 peripheral in the STM32 doing only transmit operation. Note that Uart2Tx
is a unit struct created to associate implementations with it.
3οΈβ£ Implement the Driver & its Functions π
In this part, we need to create an implementation block that includes the functions associated with the driver. Ahead of creating the driver block though, for convenience, I want to create a Config
struct that encompasses the configuration parameters for the UART block. For now, I will include the USART clock frequency and the baud:
pub struct Config {
pub freq: u32,
pub baud: u32,
}
Consequently, the driver implementation block would look like this:
impl Uart2Tx {
pub fn init(clocks: &pac::RCC, usart: &pac::USART2, cnfg: Config) {
// Enable Clock to USART2
clocks.apb1enr.write(|w| w.usart2en().set_bit());
// Enable USART2 by setting the UE bit in USART_CR1 register
usart.cr1.reset();
usart.cr1.modify(|_, w| {
w.ue().set_bit() // USART enabled
});
// Program the UART Baud Rate
usart
.brr
.write(|w| unsafe { w.bits(cnfg.freq / cnfg.baud) });
// Enable the Transmitter
usart.cr1.modify(|_, w| w.te().set_bit());
// Wait until TXE flag is set
while usart.sr.read().txe().bit_is_clear() {}
}
pub fn blocking_write(usart: &pac::USART2, data: u16) {
// Put Data in Data Register
usart.dr.write(|w| unsafe { w.dr().bits(data) });
// Wait for data to get transmitted
while usart.sr.read().tc().bit_is_clear() {}
}
}
I created two functions, init
to initialize the USART block and blocking_write
to transmit a piece of data. In the functions, I pass references to the RCC
and USART2
register blocks so that they can be referenced in the implementation. The encompassing code is exactly the same code I used in the UART Communication post, only divided into functions.
4οΈβ£ Incorporate the Abstraction & It's Functions π§°
This is the final step, the abstraction that was created needs to be incorporated and used. In cargo.toml
, the path of the abstraction layer needs to be added as a dependency. Then the abstraction can be imported with a statement like use stm32_uart_hal as hal;
. As such, to configure and initialize the UART2 peripheral, it would boil down to these lines of code:
// Configure USART Parameters
let usartcfg = hal::Config {
freq: 16_000_000,
baud: 115_200,
};
// Initialize USART
hal::Uart2Tx::init(&dp.RCC, &dp.USART2, usartcfg);
Consequently, transmitting a word would come down to a single line as follows:
hal::Uart2Tx::blocking_write(&dp.USART2, b'A' as u16);
Thats it! You can see that it didn't take much to create an abstraction. However, this is not the ideal form that one would desire. Meaning that one would rather have a single abstraction to accommodate all USART peripherals in a single device. Or even ultimately accommodate all USART peripherals in a family of devices (Ex. all STM32s). Accommodating one device probably would be manageable, however, expanding beyond that would be more involved. One would need to accommodate all the potential differences between devices in a family to configure the peripheral correctly. From what I have noticed, a lot of HAL crates seem to use macros for that, which in Rust are extremely powerful.
In the following sections, you can find the library implementation code in addition to the application code that incorporates the library.
π Hardware Abstraction Library Code
Here is the full code for the library/abstraction implementation described in this post. You can additionally find the full project and others available on the apollolabsdev Nucleo-F401RE git repo.
pub struct Config {
pub freq: u32,
pub baud: u32,
}
pub struct Uart2Tx;
impl Uart2Tx {
pub fn init(clocks: &pac::RCC, usart: &pac::USART2, cnfg: Config) {
// Enable Clock to USART2
clocks.apb1enr.write(|w| w.usart2en().set_bit());
// Enable USART2 by setting the UE bit in USART_CR1 register
usart.cr1.reset();
usart.cr1.modify(|_, w| {
w.ue().set_bit() // USART enabled
});
// Program the UART Baud Rate
usart
.brr
.write(|w| unsafe { w.bits(cnfg.freq / cnfg.baud) });
// Enable the Transmitter
usart.cr1.modify(|_, w| w.te().set_bit());
// Wait until TXE flag is set
while usart.sr.read().txe().bit_is_clear() {}
}
pub fn blocking_write(usart: &pac::USART2, data: u16) {
// Put Data in Data Register
usart.dr.write(|w| unsafe { w.dr().bits(data) });
// Wait for data to get transmitted
while usart.sr.read().tc().bit_is_clear() {}
}
}
π Full Application Code
Here is the full code for the implementation described in this post.
#![no_std]
#![no_main]
// Imports
use cortex_m_rt::entry;
use panic_halt as _;
use stm32_uart_hal as hal;
use stm32f401_pac as pac;
#[entry]
fn main() -> ! {
// Setup handler for device peripherals
let dp = pac::Peripherals::take().unwrap();
// Enable HSI Oscillator
dp.RCC.cr.modify(|_, w| w.hsion().set_bit());
// Wait for HSI clock to become ready
while dp.RCC.cr.read().hsirdy().bit() {}
// Enable Clock to GPIOA
dp.RCC.ahb1enr.write(|w| w.gpioaen().set_bit());
// Select Alternate Function for PA2
dp.GPIOA.afrl.modify(|_, w| unsafe { w.afrl2().bits(7) });
// Configure PA2 as Alternate Output
dp.GPIOA.moder.modify(|_, w| unsafe { w.moder2().bits(2) });
// Configure USART Parameters
let usartcfg = hal::Config {
freq: 16_000_000,
baud: 115_200,
};
// Initialize USART
hal::Uart2Tx::init(&dp.RCC, &dp.USART2, usartcfg);
loop {
hal::Uart2Tx::blocking_write(&dp.USART2, b'A' as u16);
}
}
π¬ Further Experimentation/Ideas
Expand the driver to include a receive function
Expand the driver to support different USART peripheral instances. Enums could be used for that.
Conclusion
Hardware abstractions in Rust are a powerful concept that can enable the support of many devices. In this post, I attempt to create a USART abstraction layer in Rust for the STM32F4. This driver is limited in what it can do and only scratches the surface when it comes to Rust capability. Additional capabilities can include incorporating embedded-hal traits, typestate, and the use of macros to cover a wider family of devices.
Top comments (0)